黑料网

Genomic selection; Marker-assisted selection; High-throughput phenotyping; Genotype-phenotype associations; Crop improvement; Sustainable agriculture

Introduction

In the realm of agricultural innovation [1], integrated genomic approaches have emerged as transformative tools for accelerating genetic enhancement in crop breeding. This introduction sets the stage for examining how these advanced genomic technologies are reshaping traditional breeding practices to address global challenges such as food security, climate change resilience, and sustainable agriculture. Historically, crop breeding has relied on phenotypic selection and classical breeding methods to improve agronomic traits [2]. However, the advent of genomics has revolutionized this field by providing insights into the genetic basis of traits and enabling more precise and efficient selection of desirable genotypes. Genomic selection (GS) stands out as a cornerstone of these advancements, leveraging genome-wide markers to predict the breeding value of plants early in the breeding cycle [3]. By harnessing genomic information, breeders can identify individuals with superior genetic potential for traits like yield, disease resistance, and stress tolerance, thereby accelerating the breeding process and increasing genetic gains.

Marker-assisted selection (MAS) complements GS by identifying and utilizing molecular markers linked to specific traits of interest. This approach enhances breeding efficiency by enabling targeted selection of genotypes carrying favorable alleles, particularly for complex traits influenced by multiple genes [4]. High-throughput phenotyping technologies have further revolutionized crop breeding by enabling rapid and detailed characterization of plant phenotypes under varying environmental conditions. These technologies provide essential data to validate genomic predictions and establish robust genotype-phenotype associations critical for effective breeding decisions [5]. The integration of these genomic approaches marks a paradigm shift in crop breeding, offering unprecedented opportunities to enhance agricultural productivity, sustainability, and resilience. However, challenges such as data management, bioinformatics infrastructure, and ethical considerations surrounding genetic manipulation require careful consideration and integration into breeding programs. This introduction sets the framework for exploring the synergistic benefits of integrated genomic approaches in crop improvement, highlighting their potential to address pressing global agricultural challenges and contribute to the future of sustainable food production.

Materials and Methods

To comprehensively review the advancements in integrated genomic approaches for accelerated genetic enhancement in crop breeding [6], a systematic search of scientific literature and relevant databases was conducted. The search included peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, and authoritative texts published. Keywords such as genomic selection, marker-assisted selection, high-throughput phenotyping, crop breeding, and genotype-phenotype associations were used to identify relevant studies [7]. Selected studies focused on methodologies and applications of integrated genomic approaches in crop breeding, with particular emphasis on: Studies elucidating the principles and applications of GS in predicting breeding values based on genome-wide markers. This included techniques such as genomic prediction models and genomic-enabled selection strategies. Investigations into the identification and utilization of molecular markers linked to target traits, facilitating efficient selection of desired genotypes in crop breeding programs.

Evaluation of technologies and methodologies for rapid and accurate phenotypic characterization of crops under varying environmental conditions. This encompassed remote sensing, imaging technologies, and automated phenotyping platforms [8-10]. Exploration of genomic tools and statistical approaches used to establish robust associations between genetic markers and phenotypic traits, providing insights into the genetic basis of trait variation. Additionally, the review considered studies addressing challenges and advancements in data management, bioinformatics tools, and ethical considerations associated with genomic technologies in crop breeding. Synthesizing these methodologies provided a comprehensive understanding of how integrated genomic approaches are transforming crop breeding practices, enhancing breeding efficiency, and contributing to sustainable agricultural development.

Conclusion

The integration of integrated genomic approaches has revolutionized crop breeding, offering powerful tools to accelerate genetic enhancement and address global agricultural challenges. Throughout this review, we have explored the transformative impact of genomic selection (GS), marker-assisted selection (MAS), high-throughput phenotyping, and genotype-phenotype associations in advancing crop improvement strategies. Genomic selection has significantly expedited breeding cycles by enabling breeders to predict the breeding value of plants early in the selection process with unprecedented accuracy. By leveraging genome-wide markers, GS has facilitated the identification and deployment of superior genetic traits related to yield, disease resistance, and stress tolerance, thereby enhancing crop productivity and resilience in diverse environments. Marker-assisted selection continues to play a crucial role in targeting specific genes or genomic regions associated with desired traits, complementing GS to achieve more efficient selection of genotypes with favorable alleles. This approach has proven effective in improving complex traits that are challenging to address through conventional breeding methods alone. High-throughput phenotyping technologies have revolutionized the characterization of crop phenotypes, enabling rapid and precise assessment of traits under various environmental conditions. These advancements have provided valuable data to validate genomic predictions and establish robust genotype-phenotype associations, enhancing breeding precision and effectiveness.

The synergistic application of these integrated genomic approaches has not only accelerated genetic gains but also contributed to sustainable agricultural practices by reducing resource inputs and environmental impacts. However, challenges such as data management, bioinformatics infrastructure, and ethical considerations surrounding genetic manipulation remain critical areas for ongoing research and development. Looking forward, continued innovation and collaboration among researchers, breeders, policymakers, and stakeholders will be essential to harnessing the full potential of integrated genomic approaches in crop breeding. By addressing these challenges and maximizing the adoption of genomic technologies, we can meet the increasing global demand for food security, climate resilience, and sustainable agriculture. In conclusion, integrated genomic approaches represent a paradigm shift in crop breeding, offering unprecedented opportunities to enhance agricultural productivity, resilience, and sustainability. By leveraging genomic insights and advanced technologies, we can shape a future where crops are more productive, resilient to environmental stresses, and contribute to global food security.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Cartea E, Bailón ADH, Padilla G, Cano SO, Celestino MDR, et al. (2019) . Foods 8: 292.

, ,

2. Cao Z, Tian F, Wang N, Jiang C, Lin B, Xia W, et al. (2010) . J Genet Genomics 37: 231-240.

, ,

3. Ahmad S, Veyrat N, Weeks RG, Zhang Y, Martin J, et al. (2011) . Plant Physiology 157: 317-327.

, ,

4. Zheng L, McMullen MD, Bauer E, Schön CC, Gierl A, et al. (2015) . J Exp Bot 66: 3917-3930.

, ,

5. Anfossi L, Giovannoli C, Baggiani C (2016) . Curr Opinin Biotechnol 37: 120-126.

, ,

6. Li P, Zhang Z, Hu X, Zhang Q (2013) . Mass Spectrom Rev 32: 420-452.

, ,

7. Bai Y, Lindhout P (2007) Ann of Bot 100: 1085-1094.

, ,

8. Ballester AR, Norelli J, Burchard E, Abdelfattah A, Levin E, et al. (2017) . Front Plant Sci 8: 1981.

, ,

9. Li HX, Xiao CL (2008) . Phytopathology 98: 427-435.

, ,

10. Blanca J, Pau JM, Sauvage C, Bauchet G, Illa E, et al. (2015) . BMC Genomics 16: 257.

, ,