黑料网

In the intricate world of agriculture, the challenge of protecting crops from biotic stressors has always been a focal point of research. With the growing need for sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural practices, the exploration of microbial bio-agents as elicitors in plant defense systems has gained significant attention. This article delves into the multifaceted realm of microbial bio-agents, examining their effectiveness in enhancing plant defense mechanisms against biotic stressors.

Understanding biotic stress

Biotic stress in plants arises from various living organisms such as pathogens, pests, and parasites. These stressors can compromise the plant's growth, yield, and overall health, leading to substantial economic losses in agriculture. Traditional methods of combating biotic stress often involve the use of chemical pesticides, which come with environmental and health concerns. As a result, there is a growing need for sustainable alternatives that can mitigate the impact of biotic stressors while minimizing adverse effects.

Microbial bio-agents as elicitors

Microbial bio-agents, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses, have emerged as potential allies in the battle against biotic stress. These agents can act as elicitors, triggering a range of defense responses in plants. One key mechanism involves the activation of the plant's innate immune system, leading to the production of defensive compounds and the reinforcement of physical barriers.

The role of microbial bio-agents in induced systemic resistance (ISR)

Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR) is a phenomenon wherein a plant's resistance to pathogens is enhanced following exposure to certain microorganisms. This process involves the activation of various signaling pathways that prime the plant to respond more effectively to subsequent biotic stress. Numerous studies have demonstrated the ability of microbial bio-agents to induce ISR, providing a sustainable and environmentally friendly approach to plant protection.

Elicitor-mediated defense signaling pathways

Microbial bio-agents can influence intricate signaling pathways within plants, such as the jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and ethylene (ET) pathways. These signaling molecules play pivotal roles in regulating defense responses against different types of stressors. Understanding how microbial bio-agents modulate these pathways is crucial for optimizing their efficacy as elicitors in plant defense.

Challenges and considerations

While the potential benefits of microbial bio-agents as elicitors are promising, several challenges and considerations must be addressed. Factors such as the specificity of the elicitor, environmental conditions, and interactions with other microorganisms can influence their effectiveness. Additionally, the formulation and application methods of these bio-agents need optimization to ensure practical and widespread use in agriculture [1-6].

Discussion

The effectiveness of microbial bio-agents as elicitors in plant defense against biotic stress is a complex and multifaceted subject that warrants detailed discussion. The observed activation of Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR) by these agents is a promising aspect, as it implies a systemic and long-lasting enhancement of plant defense mechanisms. The modulation of key defense signaling pathways, such as JA, SA, and ET, highlights the intricate molecular interactions underlying the plantmicrobe relationship. One notable advantage of microbial bio-agents is their potential to provide a targeted and eco-friendly alternative to traditional chemical pesticides. By activating the plant's innate immune system, these bio-agents can prime crops to better withstand various stressors, reducing the need for external chemical inputs. This aligns with the broader goals of sustainable agriculture and environmental conservation. However, challenges in the practical implementation of microbial bio-agents must be acknowledged. The specificity of these elicitors is crucial, as non-specific activation may lead to unintended consequences. Environmental factors, such as temperature and humidity, can influence the efficacy of bio-agents, necessitating careful consideration in different agricultural contexts. Additionally, the formulation and application methods need refinement to ensure ease of use and scalability.

The discussion also emphasizes the importance of further research in optimizing the use of microbial bio-agents. Fine-tuning the interactions between these agents and plants, understanding the nuances of different signaling pathways, and addressing practical challenges will contribute to their successful integration into mainstream agriculture [7-10].

Conclusion

The assessment of microbial bio-agents as elicitors in the defense system of plants under biotic stress represents a dynamic and evolving field of research. As we strive for sustainable agriculture, harnessing the power of these microscopic allies offers a promising avenue for reducing our reliance on chemical pesticides. Continued research and innovation in this area will contribute to the development of effective and eco-friendly strategies to safeguard global food security while preserving the health of our ecosystems.

Acknowledgment

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Lee SM, Kim KH, Kim EJ (2012) . Journal of Animal Science and Technology 32:54-56.

, ,

2. Zheng Rui (2015) . Enterprise Reform and Management 32: 154-156.
3. Orouskhani M, Shi D, Cheng X (2021) . IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 29:118-128.
4. Tang Huanling, Wang Jingdong, Lu Yuchang (2004) . Computer Engineering and Applications 58: 185-188.
5. Wang Zeyan, Gu Hongfang, Yi Xiaoxin, Zhang Shenru (2003) . Systems Engineering Theory and Practice 69: 112-116.

, ,

6. Kilgour, Marc D, Grégoire (2021) . Social Choice and Welfare 58:1-2.
7. Pierrat L, Samuel K (2013) . International Journal of Performability Engineering 9:352-354.
8. Ke Nianri, Zhang Chaomo, Wang Yingwei (2010) . Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 7: 76-78.
9. Aroian, Leo A (1996) . Technometrics 25:112-115.
10. Taylor M (2008) . Inproceedings 2008:77-86.