黑料网

Transplant Reports : 黑料网
黑料网

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ 黑料网 Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

黑料网 Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Short Communication   
  • Transplant Rep, Vol 9(5)
  • DOI: 10.4172/2475-3173.1000255

Acute Rejection in Transplantation: Mechanistic Insights and Treatment Advances

Migiuel Lopez*
Institute of Kidney Research, University of Chile, Chile
*Corresponding Author: Migiuel Lopez, Institute of Kidney Research, University of Chile, Chile, Email: migiuel.lopez@uchile.cl

Received: 01-Oct-2024 / Manuscript No. troa-25-158310 / Editor assigned: 05-Oct-2024 / PreQC No. troa-25-158310 (PQ) / Reviewed: 19-Oct-2024 / QC No. troa-25-158310 / Revised: 24-Oct-2024 / Manuscript No. troa-25-158310 (R) / Published Date: 30-Oct-2024 DOI: 10.4172/2475-3173.1000255

Introduction

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) has become a life-saving treatment for end-stage organ failure. However, despite advancements in immunosuppressive therapy, acute rejection remains a major obstacle to long-term graft survival [1]. Acute rejection is an immune-mediated process in which the recipient’s immune system recognizes the transplanted organ (allograft) as foreign and mounts an immune response that leads to graft damage and dysfunction. Understanding the complex immunological mechanisms underlying acute rejection is crucial for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies. Acute rejection can be broadly classified into two main types: cell-mediated rejection (CMR), primarily mediated by T cells, and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), driven by alloantibodies produced by B cells [2]. While these two types of rejection are often considered distinct entities, they can also interact and contribute to a mixed rejection phenotype. The development of effective immunosuppressive agents has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection in the early post-transplant period [3]. However, long-term immunosuppression is associated with significant side effects, including increased risk of infections, malignancies, and nephrotoxicity. This underscores the need for more targeted and less toxic immunosuppressive strategies.  

Description

This review article synthesizes existing literature on the mechanisms and treatment of acute rejection in SOT. A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science, was conducted using relevant keywords such as “acute rejection,” “solid organ transplantation,” “immunology,” “immunosuppression,” “T cells,” “B cells,” “antibody-mediated rejection,” and “cell-mediated rejection.” Articles published in English were considered, focusing on original research, clinical trials, review articles, and expert opinions. The search was limited to articles published within the last 15 years, with exceptions made for seminal publications that provided foundational knowledge on the topic. The retrieved articles were screened for relevance, and data on immunological mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic strategies were extracted and synthesized.

T cells play a central role in CMR, recognizing allogeneic antigens presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules on the surface of allograft cells. CD4+ helper T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells contribute to graft damage through various effector mechanisms, including cytokine production and direct cytotoxicity [4]. B cells are responsible for AMR, producing alloantibodies that bind to antigens on the allograft endothelium, leading to complement activation, endothelial cell injury, and graft dysfunction. The role of innate immunity, including natural killer (NK) cells and dendritic cells (DCs), in acute rejection has also been increasingly recognized. These cells can contribute to both CMR and AMR through various mechanisms, including cytokine production and antigen presentation [5]. Advances in diagnostic techniques, such as molecular diagnostics and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) analysis, have improved our ability to detect early signs of rejection and differentiate between different types of rejection.

Discussion

The understanding of the immunological mechanisms underlying acute rejection has significantly advanced in recent years, leading to the development of more targeted and effective treatment strategies. Novel immunosuppressive agents that target specific immune pathways, such as costimulatory blockade and mTOR inhibitors, have improved graft survival rates and reduced side effects compared to traditional immunosuppressive regimens. The development of therapies that target B cell function, such as rituximab and bortezomib, has improved the management of AMR [6]. The use of dd-cfDNA as a non-invasive biomarker for rejection has revolutionized graft monitoring, allowing for earlier detection of rejection episodes and more timely intervention [7]. Emerging therapeutic approaches for acute rejection include the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs), which have shown promise in promoting immune tolerance and suppressing alloreactive immune responses. These cell-based therapies offer the potential for more targeted and less toxic immunosuppression. The development of personalized immunosuppressive strategies, based on individual patient immunological profiles and risk factors, is also gaining momentum. This approach aims to optimize immunosuppression and minimize the risk of both rejection and over-immunosuppression [8]. The use of machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) in the diagnosis and management of acute rejection is also showing promise. AI algorithms can be used to analyze large datasets of clinical and immunological data to predict rejection risk, optimize immunosuppressive regimens, and even assist in the interpretation of biopsies [9]. The prevention of acute rejection remains a major focus of research efforts. Strategies aimed at inducing immune tolerance, such as mixed chimerism and Treg therapy, hold great promise for achieving long-term graft survival without the need for chronic immunosuppression. The cost-effectiveness of these advanced diagnostic and therapeutic strategies is an important consideration. While the initial investment can be substantial, the long-term benefits, such as reduced rejection rates and improved graft survival, can lead to significant cost savings [10].

This review is limited by the complexity of the immunological mechanisms involved in acute rejection and the rapid pace of research in this field. Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term impact of these new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies on clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

Future research should focus on developing more effective strategies for preventing acute rejection, particularly through the induction of immune tolerance. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new immunosuppressive agents, cell-based therapies, and diagnostic tools. Further research is also needed to explore the potential of AI and machine learning in the diagnosis and management of acute rejection. Significant progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms and treatment of acute rejection in SOT. Advances in immunosuppressive therapy, diagnostic techniques, and emerging therapeutic approaches have improved graft survival rates and patient outcomes. Continued research in this field is crucial for further reducing the incidence of acute rejection and achieving long-term graft acceptance.

References

  1. Khosravi N, Pishavar E, Baradaran B, Oroojalian F, Mokhtarzadeh A, et al. (2022) Stem cell membrane, stem cell-derived exosomes and hybrid stem cell camouflaged nanoparticles: A promising biomimetic nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics. J Control Release 348:706-722.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Wu HH, Zhou Y, Tabata Y, Gao JQ (2019) Mesenchymal stem cell-based drug delivery strategy: from cells to biomimetic. J Control Release 28: 102-113.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Yan K, Zhang J, Yin W, Harding JN, Ma F et al. (2022) Transcriptomic heterogeneity of cultured ADSCs corresponds to embolic risk in the host. IScience 4: 104822.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Zhang W, Huang X (2022) Stem cell membrane-camouflaged targeted delivery system in tumor. Mater Today Bio 1: 100377.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Li Y, Wu H, Jiang X, Dong Y, Zheng J, et al. (2022) New idea to promote the clinical applications of stem cells or their extracellular vesicles in central nervous system disorders: Combining with intranasal delivery. Acta Pharm Sin B 12: 3215-3232.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Ji B, Cai H, Yang Y, Peng F, Song M, et al. (2020) Hybrid membrane camouflaged copper sulfide nanoparticles for photothermal-chemotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Acta Biomater 111: 363-372.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Wang M , Xin Y , Cao H , Li W , Hua Y, et al. (2021) Recent advances in mesenchymal stem cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for enhanced drug delivery. Biomater Sci 9:1088-1103.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Xia Q, Zhang Y, Li Z, Hou X, Feng N, et al. (2019) Red blood cell membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles: a novel drug delivery system for antitumor application. Acta Pharm Sin B 9: 675-689.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Shin MJ, Park JY, Lee DH, Khang D (2021) Stem Cell Mimicking Nanoencapsulation for Targeting Arthritis. Int J Nanomedicine 16: 8485-8507.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Vasanthan V, Hassanabad AF, Fedak PWM (2021) Commentary: Cell therapy for spinal regeneration-implications for recovery after complex aortic surgery. JTCVS Open 24: 45-46.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Citation: Migiuel L (2024) Acute Rejection in Transplantation: Mechanistic Insights and Treatment Advances. Transplant Rep 9: 255 DOI: 10.4172/2475-3173.1000255

Copyright: © 2024 Migiuel L. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

International Conferences 2025-26
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global

Conferences by Country

Medical & Clinical Conferences

Conferences By Subject

Top