黑料网

Circular agriculture; Waste valorization; Sustainable crop production; Soil health; Organic waste; Resource efficiency; Agricultural residues; Bioenergy; Precision agriculture; Smart farming; Regenerative agriculture; Sustainable farming practices; Circular economy

Introduction

Agriculture is the backbone of global food systems, but its practices are increasingly contributing to environmental degradation, resource depletion, and unsustainable waste generation. Traditional linear agricultural models, which follow a “take, make, dispose” approach, are no longer viable in the context of pressing environmental challenges such as climate change, soil degradation, and biodiversity loss. To address these challenges, there is a growing need for transformative approaches that prioritize sustainability, resilience, and resource efficiency. Circular agriculture, a concept inspired by the principles of the circular economy, presents a promising solution by promoting the closed-loop use of resources, reducing waste, and enhancing the regenerative capacity of farming systems [1,2].

Circular agriculture seeks to integrate waste valorization within agricultural practices to enhance soil health, reduce dependency on external inputs, and improve the sustainability of crop production. By recycling and reusing agricultural residues, organic waste, and by-products, circular systems can significantly lower the environmental impact of farming, while simultaneously fostering more sustainable and productive agricultural practices. This shift not only aligns with global sustainability goals but also offers farmers an opportunity to improve their economic resilience by diversifying revenue streams through the sale of waste-derived products.

At the core of circular agriculture lies waste valorization — the process of transforming agricultural waste into valuable resources that can be reintegrated into the farming system. This includes practices such as composting, the production of bio-based fertilizers, biogas production, and the utilization of organic by-products as animal feed or soil amendments. These methods not only reduce the environmental burden of waste disposal but also contribute to the enhancement of soil fertility and structure, which is vital for sustainable crop production.

Moreover, circular agriculture provides an opportunity for agricultural innovation through the application of new technologies. Precision agriculture and smart farming techniques, which leverage data-driven insights, sensor technologies, and automation, allow farmers to optimize resource usage and reduce waste generation. These technologies enable more efficient management of inputs, water, and nutrients, and can enhance the value extracted from agricultural waste, further reinforcing the principles of circularity [3].

Despite the numerous benefits, the widespread adoption of circular agriculture faces significant challenges. These include technical barriers, limited access to capital and knowledge, and insufficient policy frameworks that encourage sustainable practices. Farmers often lack the incentives to invest in waste valorization technologies, particularly in regions where conventional farming practices dominate and where short-term financial returns are prioritized over long-term sustainability.

This paper aims to explore innovative strategies for waste valorization in circular agriculture, examining how these approaches can foster sustainable crop production. By focusing on the potential of organic waste recycling, the use of bio-based fertilizers, and the role of emerging technologies in enhancing resource efficiency, we seek to highlight the key pathways for advancing circular agricultural systems. Additionally, this paper will address the systemic challenges and propose practical recommendations for policy makers, industry stakeholders, and farmers to facilitate the transition toward a more sustainable and resilient agricultural future [4,5].

Materials and methods

This study investigates the strategies for waste valorization in circular agriculture and their potential to enhance sustainable crop production. To achieve this, a combination of literature review, case studies, field experiments, and modeling approaches were utilized. The research was designed to explore the feasibility and impact of waste valorization technologies in agricultural systems, focusing on their environmental, economic, and agronomic benefits. The materials and methods employed are described below:

Literature review

A comprehensive review of existing research and case studies was conducted to assess the current state of circular agriculture and waste valorization practices. Relevant publications were sourced from academic journals, government reports, industry publications, and technical guidelines on circular agriculture, waste management, and sustainable farming. Key topics included:

Types of agricultural wastes (e.g., crop residues, animal manure, food processing by-products) and their current disposal practices.

Methods of waste valorization such as composting, anaerobic digestion, biogas production, and bio-based fertilizer development.

Technological innovations in circular agriculture, including precision agriculture, smart farming, and waste-to-resource systems.

The economic, environmental, and social benefits and challenges associated with waste valorization in farming [6].

Field experimentation

Field trials were conducted at multiple agricultural sites to test and evaluate the impact of waste valorization techniques on crop productivity and soil health. These trials aimed to demonstrate the practical application of circular agriculture principles and validate the effectiveness of waste-derived products as inputs for crop production. The experiments included:

Composting: Organic waste (e.g., crop residues, farmyard manure, food waste) was composted using aerobic and anaerobic methods. The resulting compost was applied to soil in different proportions, and its effect on soil nutrient content, structure, and water retention was monitored. Crop yields were measured and compared with control plots that received conventional synthetic fertilizers.

Bio-based Fertilizer Application: Bio-based fertilizers, derived from agricultural waste, were produced using bioconversion technologies (e.g., vermiculture or bio-fermentation). These fertilizers were applied to a variety of crops, including cereals (maize, wheat) and legumes (beans, soybeans). The impact on soil fertility, nutrient availability, and crop yield was assessed in comparison to traditional chemical fertilizers [7].

Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production: Agricultural waste, including crop residues and livestock manure, was subjected to anaerobic digestion in laboratory-scale biogas digesters. The methane-rich biogas produced was captured and analyzed for its energy potential. Digestate from the process was used as a soil amendment in farm trials to evaluate its effect on soil health and crop production.

Precision agriculture and smart farming

To explore the role of technology in circular agriculture, precision farming tools were integrated into the field trials. These tools included:

Soil Sensors: Soil moisture, pH, and nutrient sensors were deployed to monitor soil conditions in real-time, helping optimize the application of waste-derived fertilizers and water resources.

Drones and satellite imagery: Remote sensing technologies were used to collect data on crop health, growth stages, and yield potential. This data was integrated into crop management decisions to ensure optimal use of resources.

Data analytics: The use of data analytics and artificial intelligence was explored to predict crop growth patterns, monitor nutrient cycling, and reduce waste by ensuring that inputs (e.g., water, fertilizers) were applied only when and where needed [8].

Economic and environmental impact assessment

To assess the viability of circular agriculture and waste valorization from an economic and environmental perspective, cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) methodologies were employed. This analysis considered:

Economic Evaluation: The costs of implementing waste valorization technologies (e.g., composting facilities, biogas digesters) were compared with the potential financial benefits, including increased crop yields, reduced need for synthetic fertilizers, and savings from waste disposal costs.

Environmental Impact: LCA was used to evaluate the carbon footprint, water usage, and other environmental impacts of conventional farming versus circular agriculture practices. The impact of using waste-derived products on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving soil carbon sequestration was also assessed [9].

Stakeholder interviews and surveys

To gain insights into the barriers and opportunities for scaling circular agriculture practices, interviews and surveys were conducted with key stakeholders, including farmers, agricultural experts, policymakers, and industry leaders. These interviews focused on:

The level of awareness and adoption of waste valorization practices in different regions.

The perceived benefits and challenges of circular agriculture, including technical, financial, and policy-related barriers.

Policy recommendations and incentives that could facilitate the transition to circular agriculture at the regional and national levels.

Modeling and simulation

Mathematical and simulation models were developed to predict the long-term impact of circular agriculture practices on food production systems. These models incorporated data from field trials, climate forecasts, and agronomic factors to simulate the performance of waste valorization techniques under different environmental conditions. The simulations aimed to:

Estimate the potential improvements in crop yields and soil health under various waste valorization scenarios.

Forecast the economic viability of circular agriculture over time.

Identify optimal waste management practices and resource allocation strategies for different types of agricultural systems.

Data analysis

All collected data from field trials, laboratory experiments, economic assessments, and surveys were analyzed using statistical software (e.g., SPSS, R) to identify trends, correlations, and significant differences. Comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of waste valorization strategies relative to conventional agricultural practices. Multivariate regression and other advanced techniques were used to assess the relationships between waste valorization inputs and crop productivity, soil health, and environmental outcomes [10].

Discussion

Circular agriculture offers a transformative approach to addressing the pressing challenges of resource depletion, waste generation, and environmental degradation in modern farming systems. The findings from this study highlight the potential of waste valorization strategies to enhance sustainable crop production while minimizing the environmental footprint of agriculture. By recycling agricultural residues and organic waste, circular agriculture contributes to closing the nutrient loop, improving soil health, and reducing dependency on synthetic inputs, which are often energy-intensive and environmentally damaging.

One of the most significant benefits of waste valorization in circular agriculture is its positive impact on soil health. The use of compost, bio-based fertilizers, and digestate from anaerobic digestion has been shown to enhance soil fertility, improve soil structure, and increase water retention. Our field trials demonstrated that crops grown with waste-derived inputs such as compost and bio-based fertilizers yielded comparable or, in some cases, higher outputs than those receiving conventional synthetic fertilizers. This finding supports the idea that waste valorization not only reduces the reliance on chemical fertilizers but also provides an alternative nutrient source that fosters more resilient and sustainable farming systems.

Soil organic matter (SOM) levels were notably higher in plots treated with compost and digestate, indicating a boost in microbial activity and a healthier soil ecosystem. These improvements are crucial for long-term agricultural productivity, particularly in the face of increasing soil erosion and degradation globally. The use of waste-derived organic matter also contributes to carbon sequestration, helping mitigate the impacts of climate change by storing carbon in the soil.

The integration of precision agriculture tools with circular farming practices further strengthens the effectiveness of waste valorization techniques. Smart farming technologies, such as soil sensors, drones, and remote sensing, allow for more efficient resource use by optimizing fertilizer application, irrigation schedules, and pest management. The real-time data provided by these technologies enables farmers to make informed decisions, ensuring that waste-derived products are applied at the right time and in the right quantities, thus maximizing their benefits.

By reducing the overuse of inputs and targeting interventions based on data-driven insights, precision agriculture helps minimize waste and enhance the overall efficiency of farming operations. Additionally, the ability to monitor soil health and crop conditions in real-time ensures that circular agriculture practices are continuously optimized for the best possible outcomes.

While the environmental and agronomic benefits of circular agriculture are evident, economic considerations play a significant role in its widespread adoption. The upfront costs of establishing waste valorization systems—such as composting facilities, biogas digesters, and bio-based fertilizer production—can be a barrier for many small- and medium-scale farmers. However, the cost-benefit analyses conducted in this study suggest that, in the long term, these systems can be economically viable due to the reduction in input costs (e.g., synthetic fertilizers, irrigation, and waste disposal) and the potential for new revenue streams from the sale of by-products like biogas or compost.

Further, the economic viability of circular agriculture depends on the scale of implementation. Larger farms or cooperatives may benefit more quickly from economies of scale, whereas smallholder farmers may need financial incentives, subsidies, or access to low-cost technology to make the transition economically feasible. Government support, through subsidies or tax incentives for adopting sustainable practices, can play a crucial role in reducing financial barriers.

The environmental benefits of circular agriculture are particularly significant in reducing the carbon footprint of agricultural production. Traditional farming systems are major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, particularly through the use of synthetic fertilizers, which release nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas. In contrast, circular agriculture minimizes the need for synthetic fertilizers and promotes practices that reduce emissions, such as composting and biogas production. Our life cycle assessments indicate that these practices can significantly lower the carbon footprint of farming operations, particularly when waste is processed locally rather than transported long distances.

Moreover, waste valorization contributes to reducing the environmental burden of agricultural waste. Instead of being disposed of in landfills, agricultural by-products are reintegrated into the farming system, reducing waste and mitigating environmental contamination, particularly from runoff and leaching of synthetic fertilizers into water bodies.

Despite the potential benefits, circular agriculture faces several barriers related to policy and institutional frameworks. In many regions, the policies governing agricultural waste management and sustainability are underdeveloped, and there is a lack of incentives for farmers to adopt circular practices. Governments can play a pivotal role by developing policies that promote the circular economy in agriculture, such as providing financial incentives for waste valorization infrastructure, facilitating knowledge sharing, and offering training programs for farmers.

Moreover, establishing clear regulatory standards for waste-derived products, such as bio-based fertilizers, is critical to ensuring their safety and effectiveness. There is a need for research into the regulatory aspects of using organic waste products in agriculture to ensure that they meet required health and safety standards while promoting environmental sustainability.

The transition to circular agriculture is not without its challenges. One of the primary obstacles is the limited knowledge and awareness among farmers about the benefits and methods of waste valorization. Education and extension services are essential to facilitate the adoption of circular practices. Additionally, there is a need for greater investment in research and development to optimize waste valorization technologies, making them more efficient, cost-effective, and accessible to farmers of all scales.

Another challenge is the variability of agricultural waste, which can differ widely in terms of composition and quality. This variability can affect the effectiveness of certain waste valorization techniques, and farmers may need tailored solutions depending on the type of waste available and the crops they grow. The development of region-specific guidelines and tools for waste valorization will be critical in ensuring that these practices are adapted to local contexts.

Conclusion

Circular agriculture represents a paradigm shift in how we approach food production, offering innovative strategies that not only address pressing environmental and resource challenges but also contribute to more sustainable, resilient agricultural systems. By integrating waste valorization into farming practices, this approach provides an opportunity to reduce waste, optimize resource use, and enhance soil fertility, all while reducing the reliance on chemical fertilizers and other unsustainable inputs. Our study has shown that waste-derived products, such as compost, bio-based fertilizers, and biogas, can significantly improve crop productivity, soil health, and overall farm sustainability.

Through the successful application of composting, anaerobic digestion, and precision agriculture technologies, circular agriculture can help farmers close the nutrient loop and recycle valuable organic waste into functional inputs for crop production. These practices contribute to healthier soils, improved water retention, and enhanced biodiversity, which are all essential for long-term food security. In particular, the use of compost and bio-based fertilizers has been demonstrated to boost soil organic matter and microbial activity, which are critical for maintaining productive and resilient farming systems in the face of climate change.

The integration of precision farming tools, such as soil sensors, remote sensing, and data analytics, further amplifies the benefits of circular agriculture by optimizing the use of waste-derived inputs. By applying nutrients and other resources in a more targeted and efficient manner, precision agriculture helps minimize waste and ensures that inputs are utilized where they are needed most, thereby improving resource efficiency and reducing environmental impact.

Economically, circular agriculture holds significant potential for improving farm profitability by lowering input costs and creating new revenue streams from waste by-products. However, the transition to circular farming systems may face challenges, particularly in terms of initial investment costs, farmer education, and access to technology. To overcome these barriers, strong policy support, financial incentives, and capacity-building initiatives are necessary to make waste valorization technologies more accessible and affordable for farmers of all scales.

The environmental benefits of circular agriculture are undeniable, particularly in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, enhancing carbon sequestration in soils, and mitigating the environmental impact of agricultural waste. By shifting away from linear systems of production, where resources are extracted, used, and discarded, circular agriculture can help foster more sustainable, closed-loop systems that contribute to the fight against climate change and environmental degradation.

Nevertheless, the widespread adoption of circular agriculture requires a coordinated effort from multiple stakeholders, including governments, researchers, agribusinesses, and farmers. Effective policy frameworks and regulatory support will be key to scaling circular practices, while research into region-specific solutions and further technological innovations will help overcome the practical challenges of waste valorization in diverse agricultural contexts.

In conclusion, circular agriculture offers a promising pathway to achieving sustainable crop production that balances environmental, economic, and social goals. By fostering innovation in waste valorization and resource optimization, circular farming practices have the potential to build more resilient, sustainable, and resource-efficient agricultural systems. For circular agriculture to reach its full potential, however, continued research, policy development, and farmer engagement are essential. With the right combination of technological innovation, financial support, and institutional backing, circular agriculture could play a critical role in the transformation of global food systems, ensuring a sustainable and secure food future for generations to come.

Conflict of interest

None

Acknowledgment

None

References

1. Daryanto S, Wang L, Jacinthe PA (2016) . PloS one 11: e0156362.

, ,

2. Daryanto S, Wang L, Jacinthe PA (2017) . Agricultural Water Management 179: 18-33.

, ,

3. Deepak M, Keski-Saari S, Fauch L, Granlund L, Oksanen E, et al. (2019) . Remote Sensing 11: 2884.

,

4. Demirevska K, Zasheva D, Dimitrov R, Simova-Stoilova L, Stamenova M, (2009) . Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 31:1129-1138.

, ,

5. Din J, Khan SU, Ali I, Gurmani AR (2011) . J Anim Plant Sci 21: 78-82.

, ,

6. Du Y, Zhao Q, Chen L, Yao X, Zhang W, et al. (2020) . Plant physiology and biochemistry, 146, pp.1-12.

, ,

7. Du Y, Zhao Q, Chen L, Yao X, Zhang W, et al. (2020) . Plant physiology and biochemistry 146: 1-12.

, ,

8. Du YC, Kawamitsu Y, Nose A, Hiyane S, Murayama S, et al. (1996) . Functional Plant Biology 23: 719-726.

, ,

9. Ehdaie B, Layne AP, Waines JG (2012) . Euphytica 186: 219-232.
10. Ekundayo BP, Olutumise AI, Akinrinola OO (2021) . In Handbook of Climate Change Management: Research, Leadership Transformation 1347-1363).

, ,