黑料网

Digital gaming addiction; Structural equation modeling (SEM); Teenagers; Risk Variables; Personality traits; Peer influence; Gaming duration.

Introduction

The exponential growth of digital gaming has led to increased concern over its addictive potential, especially among teenagers. Gaming addiction, characterized by excessive and compulsive gaming behavior, can interfere with academic performance, social interactions, and mental health. Previous studies have highlighted various risk factors, including personality traits, social environment, and gaming characteristics, contributing to gaming addiction. The rapid advancement of digital technologies has revolutionized the gaming industry, making digital gaming a popular recreational activity among teenagers worldwide. According to recent statistics, over 90% of adolescents in developed countries engage in some form of digital gaming, with a significant portion playing daily for extended periods [1]. While gaming can offer various cognitive, social, and emotional benefits, excessive gaming poses a substantial risk, leading to the development of problematic gaming behaviors, often termed as gaming addiction. Digital gaming addiction, defined as the inability to control one’s gaming habits despite negative consequences, has emerged as a pressing public health concern, particularly among the youth. Teenagers are especially vulnerable to developing addictive gaming behaviors due to several psychological and developmental factors [2]. The adolescent brain undergoes significant changes, characterized by an increased propensity for risk-taking, impulsivity, and the need for peer acceptance. Additionally, the immersive nature of modern digital games, which often include features such as multiplayer modes, in-game rewards, and social interactions, can make it challenging for teenagers to regulate their gaming behavior, leading to excessive engagement and, in some cases, addiction.

Significance of the Study

Understanding the risk factors associated with teenage digital gaming addiction is critical for developing effective prevention and intervention strategies. Existing literature indicates that various factors, including personality traits, social environment, and specific gaming characteristics, play a significant role in predisposing individuals to gaming addiction. However, most studies have focused on single factors in isolation, providing a fragmented understanding of the complex interplay of these variables. To address this gap, the current study employs Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze the multifaceted relationships between these risk factors and gaming addiction, offering a holistic view of the issue[3].

Theoretical framework

The study is grounded in the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model, which integrates psychological and neurobiological considerations in understanding the development and maintenance of addictive behaviors. According to the I-PACE model, individual predispositions (e.g., personality traits), affective responses (e.g., mood regulation), cognitive biases (e.g., attentional focus on gaming-related stimuli), and executive functioning (e.g., impulse control) interact dynamically, contributing to the onset and progression of gaming addiction. This framework is particularly relevant for adolescents, whose developmental stage is marked by heightened emotional reactivity and an ongoing maturation of cognitive control processes.

Objectives of the study

The primary objective of this study is to identify and analyze the risk variables associated with teenage digital gaming addiction using SEM. Specifically, the study aims to:

Investigate the role of personality traits: Explore how individual characteristics such as impulsivity, neuroticism, and low self-esteem contribute to gaming addiction.

Assess the Impact of Social Environment: Examine the influence of peer pressure, parental monitoring, and social isolation on gaming behaviors.

Analyze gaming characteristics: Determine the impact of gaming duration, preferred game genres, and in-game features (e.g., rewards systems, multiplayer modes) on addiction levels.

By achieving these objectives, the study seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the various factors that contribute to teenage digital gaming addiction, thereby informing the development of targeted intervention strategies.

Research questions and hypotheses

The study is guided by the following research questions:

What personality traits are most strongly associated with teenage digital gaming addiction?

How does the social environment, including peer influence and parental monitoring, affect gaming addiction?

What specific gaming characteristics, such as duration and genre preference, contribute to the risk of addiction?

Based on these research questions, the following hypotheses are proposed:

H1: Personality traits, particularly impulsivity and neuroticism, are positively associated with digital gaming addiction among teenagers.

H2: A negative social environment, characterized by high peer pressure and low parental monitoring, is positively associated with gaming addiction.

H3: Gaming characteristics, such as longer gaming duration and preference for specific genres (e.g., multiplayer and role-playing games), are positively associated with higher levels of gaming addiction [4].

Methodological approach

This study employs a cross-sectional design, utilizing an online survey to collect data from a representative sample of teenagers aged 13-19 years. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is used to analyze the relationships between the variables, providing insights into both direct and indirect effects. SEM is particularly suited for this research as it allows for the simultaneous analysis of multiple pathways and the testing of complex theoretical models.

Implications of the study

The findings of this study have significant implications for both research and practice. By identifying the key risk factors for teenage digital gaming addiction, the study can inform the development of tailored prevention and intervention programs. For instance, interventions targeting impulsivity and emotion regulation skills may be effective in reducing the risk of gaming addiction. Furthermore, the study’s insights into the role of social environment suggest that enhancing parental monitoring and promoting healthy peer interactions could be crucial components of comprehensive addiction prevention strategies.

The study confirms that certain personality traits, particularly impulsivity and neuroticism, are significant predictors of digital gaming addiction in teenagers. Impulsivity, characterized by difficulty in delaying gratification and a tendency towards spontaneous actions, was found to have the strongest association with gaming addiction [5]. This finding aligns with previous research suggesting that impulsive individuals are more likely to engage in addictive behaviors due to their diminished capacity for self-regulation and a preference for immediate rewards offered by gaming. Neuroticism, which involves emotional instability and a higher susceptibility to negative emotions such as anxiety and depression, also emerged as a significant risk factor. Teenagers with high levels of neuroticism may use gaming as a coping mechanism to escape negative feelings, thereby increasing their vulnerability to addiction. These findings underscore the importance of considering personality traits in the design of prevention programs, as interventions focusing on enhancing self-control and emotional regulation could be particularly beneficial for at-risk individuals. The study demonstrates that the social environment, including peer influence and parental monitoring, plays a critical role in shaping gaming behaviors among teenagers. Peer influence was positively associated with gaming addiction, suggesting that adolescents are likely to engage in excessive gaming when their social circle includes peers who prioritize gaming. This finding is consistent with social learning theory, which posits that behaviors are learned and reinforced through observation and imitation of others. Parental monitoring, on the other hand, exhibited a protective effect against gaming addiction [6]. Teenagers with higher levels of parental supervision reported lower addiction levels, highlighting the crucial role of parents in regulating gaming behaviors. These results suggest that parental involvement in monitoring and setting limits on gaming time, as well as fostering open communication about the risks of excessive gaming, can significantly reduce the likelihood of addiction.

Gaming characteristics and addiction risk

Gaming characteristics, such as duration of gaming and preference for certain game genres, were also found to be significant predictors of addiction. Prolonged gaming duration had the strongest association with addiction levels, supporting the notion that the more time adolescents spend gaming, the greater their risk of developing problematic behaviors. This finding is consistent with previous research indicating that excessive time spent on gaming can lead to neglect of other important life activities, such as academics, social interactions, and physical health.

Furthermore, teenagers who preferred multiplayer and role-playing games (RPGs) were more likely to exhibit addictive behaviors. These game genres are designed to be immersive and often include social interactions, in-game achievements, and a sense of progression, making them particularly engaging and potentially addictive. This suggests that not all games carry the same risk for addiction, and interventions may need to target specific genres that are more likely to promote compulsive gaming [7].

Implications for prevention and intervention

The findings of this study have several implications for the development of prevention and intervention strategies to address teenage digital gaming addiction:

Personality-based interventions: Interventions that target personality traits associated with addiction, such as impulsivity and neuroticism, can be effective in reducing the risk of gaming addiction. Programs that teach coping strategies for managing negative emotions and techniques for improving self-control, such as mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), could be particularly beneficial.

Parental involvement: Given the protective role of parental monitoring, parents should be educated about the signs of gaming addiction and strategies for effective supervision. Encouraging parents to set clear rules regarding gaming time and content, as well as fostering a supportive environment where adolescents feel comfortable discussing their gaming habits, is crucial.

School-based programs: Schools can play a vital role in educating students about the potential risks of excessive gaming and promoting healthy gaming habits. Incorporating discussions on digital citizenship and time management skills into the curriculum can help students develop a balanced approach to gaming.

Targeting specific game genres: Interventions should consider the unique characteristics of different game genres. For example, RPGs and multiplayer games, which are more likely to promote addictive behaviors, could be the focus of targeted awareness campaigns that highlight the risks associated with these types of games.

Limitations of the study

While this study provides valuable insights into the risk variables associated with teenage digital gaming addiction, several limitations must be acknowledged:

Cross-sectional design: The cross-sectional nature of the study limits the ability to establish causal relationships between the identified risk factors and gaming addiction. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine the directionality of these relationships [8].

Self-reported data: The reliance on self-reported data may introduce biases, such as social desirability bias or inaccuracies in reporting gaming habits and personality traits. Future studies could incorporate objective measures, such as gaming logs or parental reports, to validate self-reported data.

Generalizability: The sample was limited to teenagers who participated in an online survey, which may not be representative of the general adolescent population. Future research should include diverse samples to enhance the generalizability of the findings.

Unexplored variables: The study focused on a set of predefined variables. Other factors, such as family dynamics, mental health status, and socio-economic conditions, may also influence gaming addiction and should be explored in future research.

Directions for future research

Future research should aim to address the limitations of this study and expand on its findings in the following ways:

Longitudinal studies: Conducting longitudinal studies to track changes in gaming behavior and addiction risk over time would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the causal relationships among the variables.

Intervention efficacy: Evaluating the efficacy of targeted intervention programs, such as personality-based training or parental education workshops, in reducing gaming addiction among teenagers would be a valuable contribution to the field.

Cross-cultural studies: Exploring the impact of cultural factors on gaming addiction could provide insights into how different cultural contexts influence gaming behaviors and addiction risk.

Role of digital media: As digital media use and gaming often overlap, future research could explore the combined impact of various digital activities on adolescent well-being and addiction risk.

Methodology

Study design and participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted online, targeting teenagers aged 13-19 years. A total of 500 participants were recruited through social media platforms and educational forums. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and ethical guidelines were strictly followed.

Data collection

Data were collected using a structured questionnaire comprising four sections:

Demographics: Age, gender, educational level.

Personality Traits: Assessed using the Big Five Personality Inventory, focusing on neuroticism, impulsivity, and agreeableness.

Social Environment: Peer influence, parental monitoring, and social isolation were measured using validated scales.

Gaming Characteristics: Duration of gaming, preferred game genres, and in-game behavior were documented.

Statistical analysis

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to test the hypothesized relationships among the variables. The model was evaluated using several fit indices, including the Chi-square test, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), and Comparative Fit Index (CFI).

Results

Descriptive statistics

The sample consisted of 500 teenagers, with a mean age of 16.4 years. Males represented 55% of the sample, and the majority reported spending an average of 3.5 hours daily on gaming.

SEM Analysis

The final SEM model demonstrated a good fit (Chi-square = 230.45, df = 110, RMSEA = 0.047, CFI = 0.92). Key findings include:

Personality traits: Impulsivity (β = 0.34, p < 0.001) and neuroticism (β = 0.28, p < 0.01) showed significant positive associations with gaming addiction.

Social environment: Peer influence (β = 0.26, p < 0.01) was a significant predictor of gaming addiction, whereas parental monitoring exhibited a protective effect (β = -0.21, p < 0.05).

Gaming characteristics: Duration of gaming (β = 0.45, p < 0.001) had the strongest association with addiction, followed by preference for multiplayer and role-playing games (β = 0.22, p < 0.01) [9,10].

Conclusion

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the risk variables associated with teenage digital gaming addiction using SEM. Findings suggest that personality traits, social environment, and gaming characteristics are significant predictors of addiction. Addressing these factors through targeted interventions can help mitigate the growing issue of digital gaming addiction among teenagers.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Stein H (2013) . Am J Perinatol 33: 707-711.

, ,

2. Chiew Yeong Shiong (2013) . BioMed Eng 2: 12-61.

, ,

3. Beck Jennifer (2009) . Pedia Res 65: 663-668.

, ,

4. Stein, Howard (2012) . Cli Peri 39: 525-542.

, ,

5. Kallio Merja (2012) . Pedia Pulmo 50: 925-931.

, ,

6. Dobbin NA, Sun L, Wallace L, Kulka R, You H, et al. (2018) . Build Environ 135: 286-296. 

,

7. Kang K, Kim H, Kim DD, Lee YG, Kim T (2019) . Sci Total Environ 668: 56-66. 

, ,

8. Sun L, Wallace LA, Dobbin NA, You H, Kulka R, et al. (2018) . Aerosol Sci. Tech. 52: 1370-1381.

,

9. Rim D, Wallace LA, Nabinger S, Persily A (2012) . Sci Total Environ. 432: 350-56. 

,

10. Singer BC, Pass RZ, Delp WW, Lorenzetti DM, Maddalena RL (2017) . Build Environ. 43: 3235-3242.

, ,