黑料网

Solid organ transplantation has become the standard of care for many patients with end-stage organ failure. However, the severe shortage of suitable donor organs remains a critical limitation, resulting in long waiting lists and significant mortality among potential recipients [1]. The development of artificial organs has emerged as a promising solution to address this critical need, offering the potential to provide temporary or permanent organ support for patients awaiting transplantation or those who are not eligible for traditional transplantation. Artificial organs encompass a broad range of devices, including mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSDs) for heart failure, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for respiratory failure, dialysis for kidney failure, and bioartificial liver support systems for liver failure [2]. These devices aim to replicate the essential functions of failing organs, providing physiological support and improving patient outcomes. The history of artificial organ development spans several decades, with significant advancements in biomaterials, engineering, and medical technology contributing to their increasing sophistication and clinical efficacy. The development of the first successful heart-lung machine during the mid-20th century marked a significant milestone, paving the way for further advancements in artificial organ technology [3].

Description

Significant progress has been made in the development of artificial hearts, ranging from pulsatile ventricular assist devices (VADs) to continuous-flow total artificial hearts (TAHs). These devices have demonstrated significant improvements in survival and quality of life for patients with severe heart failure [4]. ECMO has become a standard therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and other forms of severe respiratory failure, providing temporary lung support until lung function recovers or a lung transplant becomes available. Advances in dialysis technology, including hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, have significantly improved the management of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Bioartificial liver support systems, which incorporate hepatocytes or other biological components, have shown promise in providing temporary liver support for patients with acute liver failure [5].

Artificial organs have had a profound impact on the field of transplantation, offering life-saving support for patients with end-stage organ failure. MCSDs, such as VADs and TAHs, have become increasingly important in the management of advanced heart failure, serving as a bridge to transplantation or as destination therapy for patients who are not candidates for transplantation. ECMO has revolutionized the management of severe respiratory failure, providing critical support for patients awaiting lung transplantation or recovery of lung function. Dialysis has become an indispensable therapy for patients with ESRD, allowing them to maintain a reasonable quality of life while awaiting kidney transplantation or choosing long-term dialysis therapy. Bioartificial liver support systems offer a promising approach for managing acute liver failure, although further research is needed to optimize their clinical efficacy. The development of more biocompatible materials has been crucial for improving the long-term performance of artificial organs and reducing complications such as thrombosis and infection [6]. Advances in miniaturization and implantable technology have also improved the portability and usability of these devices. The development of bioartificial organs, which incorporate living cells or tissues, represents a promising area of research. These devices aim to provide more physiological organ support by mimicking the complex functions of native organs [7]. The integration of sensors and control systems into artificial organs has allowed for more precise monitoring and regulation of device function. This has led to improved patient outcomes and reduced complications. The cost-effectiveness of artificial organ therapy is an important consideration. While the initial cost of these devices can be substantial, the long-term benefits, such as improved survival and quality of life, can lead to significant cost savings compared to traditional transplantation or other medical therapies [8].

Discussion

The ethical implications of artificial organ use, such as patient selection criteria and resource allocation, also warrant careful consideration. Ensuring equitable access to these advanced therapies is crucial. The use of 3D printing technology is also emerging as a valuable tool in the development of artificial organs. 3D printing allows for the creation of customized devices tailored to individual patient anatomy, potentially leading to improved device performance and reduced complications [9]. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in the management of patients with artificial organs is also showing promise. AI algorithms can be used to optimize device settings, predict complications, and even assist in patient selection for transplantation [10].

Conclusion

This review is limited by the rapid pace of development in the field of artificial organs. Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term impact of these devices on patient outcomes and quality of life.

Future research should focus on developing more biocompatible materials, improving device miniaturization and portability, and enhancing the physiological function of artificial organs. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of these devices. Further research is also needed to explore the potential of bioartificial organs and the integration of AI and machine learning in the management of patients with artificial organs. Artificial organs represent a significant advancement in modern transplantation, offering life-saving support for patients with end-stage organ failure. Continued research and development in this field hold great promise for addressing the critical shortage of donor organs and improving the lives of countless individuals.

1. Khosravi N, Pishavar E, Baradaran B, Oroojalian F, Mokhtarzadeh A, et al. (2022) Stem cell membrane, stem cell-derived exosomes and hybrid stem cell camouflaged nanoparticles: A promising biomimetic nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics. J Control Release 348:706-722.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Wu HH, Zhou Y, Tabata Y, Gao JQ (2019) Mesenchymal stem cell-based drug delivery strategy: from cells to biomimetic. J Control Release 28: 102-113.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Yan K, Zhang J, Yin W, Harding JN, Ma F et al. (2022) Transcriptomic heterogeneity of cultured ADSCs corresponds to embolic risk in the host. IScience 4: 104822.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Zhang W, Huang X (2022) Stem cell membrane-camouflaged targeted delivery system in tumor. Mater Today Bio 1: 100377.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Li Y, Wu H, Jiang X, Dong Y, Zheng J, et al. (2022) New idea to promote the clinical applications of stem cells or their extracellular vesicles in central nervous system disorders: Combining with intranasal delivery. Acta Pharm Sin B 12: 3215-3232.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Ji B, Cai H, Yang Y, Peng F, Song M, et al. (2020) Hybrid membrane camouflaged copper sulfide nanoparticles for photothermal-chemotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Acta Biomater 111: 363-372.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Wang M , Xin Y , Cao H , Li W , Hua Y, et al. (2021) Recent advances in mesenchymal stem cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for enhanced drug delivery. Biomater Sci 9:1088-1103.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Xia Q, Zhang Y, Li Z, Hou X, Feng N, et al. (2019) Red blood cell membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles: a novel drug delivery system for antitumor application. Acta Pharm Sin B 9: 675-689.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Shin MJ, Park JY, Lee DH, Khang D (2021) Stem Cell Mimicking Nanoencapsulation for Targeting Arthritis. Int J Nanomedicine 16: 8485-8507.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Vasanthan V, Hassanabad AF, Fedak PWM (2021) Commentary: Cell therapy for spinal regeneration-implications for recovery after complex aortic surgery. JTCVS Open 24: 45-46.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref