黑料网

Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR); Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD); Delayed Speech Development; Auditory Processing; Brainstem Dysfunction

Introduction

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition characterized by impairments in social interaction, communication, and a restricted range of interests or repetitive behaviors [1,2]. Delayed speech and language development is a common feature among individuals with ASD, often prompting early intervention. While the etiology of ASD remains largely elusive, research has increasingly explored potential auditory processing abnormalities as part of the disorder’s multifaceted presentation [3,4]. The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is an objective, non-invasive test that measures the neural responses to auditory stimuli along the auditory pathways from the cochlea to the brainstem. By evaluating the latency and amplitude of the ABR waveforms, clinicians can infer the functional integrity of the auditory nerve and brainstem pathways [5]. ABR has been extensively used in newborn hearing screening, but its relevance extends to various neurological conditions, including ASD. This article explores the auditory brainstem response results in individuals with ASD who also exhibit delayed speech development and discusses how these findings contribute to our understanding of ASD and its potential auditory processing deficits [6,7].

Auditory processing in ASD: a theoretical overview

ASD is associated with atypical sensory processing, and auditory processing is no exception. Individuals with ASD often exhibit hyper- or hyposensitivity to sounds, difficulty with auditory localization, and challenges in filtering out background noise. These auditory processing difficulties can contribute to the core symptoms of ASD, particularly with respect to communication impairments [8]. The auditory system’s role in speech and language development is well-documented. The efficient processing of auditory signals is crucial for the development of phonological awareness, auditory discrimination, and speech perception. Any dysfunction in the auditory system, particularly at the brainstem level, can lead to delays in speech and language development, as seen in some individuals with ASD. The brainstem, a crucial component of the auditory pathway, plays an essential role in processing sound before it reaches the higher cortical areas. Therefore, understanding the brainstem’s functioning in individuals with ASD could provide critical insights into their auditory and speech processing difficulties. The ABR test provides a window into the brainstem’s activity and may reveal abnormalities that could explain the delayed speech development seen in many individuals with ASD [9,10].

ABR findings in individuals with ASD

Research on ABR findings in individuals with ASD has yielded mixed results, but several consistent patterns have emerged. The most frequently observed abnormality is prolonged wave I and wave V latencies. These findings suggest potential dysfunction in the auditory nerve and brainstem processing, leading to delays in the transmission of auditory information to higher cortical areas.

Prolonged wave I latency: Prolonged wave I latencies indicate delayed neural conduction in the auditory nerve. This finding suggests that individuals with ASD may experience abnormalities at the earliest stage of auditory processing, potentially due to altered cochlear nerve functioning or cochlear synaptopathy.

Prolonged wave V latency: The prolongation of wave V latency, the most robust and clinically significant waveform, reflects delayed neural conduction in the brainstem. Since wave V is primarily generated by the inferior colliculus, prolonged latencies may indicate deficits in midbrain auditory processing. This delay could have profound implications for the ability of individuals with ASD to process auditory signals, contributing to communication difficulties.

Increased interpeak latencies: Some studies have found that individuals with ASD exhibit increased interpeak latencies between waves I and V, indicating slower transmission of auditory information along the brainstem pathway. This finding aligns with the hypothesis of brainstem dysfunction in ASD and suggests that the transmission of auditory signals to the auditory cortex is impaired, contributing to the speech and language delays observed in this population.

Reduced wave amplitudes: In some cases, reduced wave amplitudes have been reported, particularly in wave V. Reduced amplitudes may reflect diminished neural synchrony in the auditory brainstem, which could contribute to the auditory processing difficulties experienced by individuals with ASD.

Implications for delayed speech development in ASD

The presence of ABR abnormalities in individuals with ASD, particularly those with delayed speech development, suggests that auditory brainstem dysfunction may play a role in the speech and language deficits commonly observed in this population. Delayed or abnormal auditory processing at the brainstem level could impair the ability to accurately perceive and discriminate speech sounds, leading to delays in phonological development, speech production, and ultimately, verbal communication. Given that auditory input is critical for speech and language acquisition, disruptions in the auditory pathway could have cascading effects on speech development. The brainstem’s role in encoding temporal aspects of sound, such as timing and rhythm, is particularly relevant for speech perception. Abnormal ABR findings in ASD may reflect difficulties in processing these temporal aspects of auditory stimuli, contributing to the challenges individuals with ASD face in understanding and producing language.

Clinical applications and future research directions

The findings of ABR abnormalities in individuals with ASD and delayed speech development have several clinical implications. ABR testing may serve as a valuable diagnostic tool in the early identification of auditory processing deficits in individuals with ASD. Early detection of ABR abnormalities could prompt targeted interventions, such as auditory training or speech therapy, aimed at improving auditory processing and speech development. Additionally, ABR testing could be used to monitor the effectiveness of interventions over time. For example, improvements in ABR wave latencies or amplitudes following therapeutic interventions could serve as objective measures of treatment efficacy. Future research should continue to explore the relationship between ABR abnormalities and speech development in ASD. Longitudinal studies could help determine whether ABR abnormalities present in infancy or early childhood predict later speech and language outcomes. Furthermore, research should investigate the underlying neural mechanisms contributing to ABR abnormalities in ASD, including potential genetic or environmental factors. The heterogeneity of ASD suggests that not all individuals with the disorder will exhibit ABR abnormalities, and understanding the factors that contribute to these differences will be critical for developing personalized interventions. Additionally, exploring the relationship between ABR findings and other sensory processing abnormalities in ASD could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the disorder’s neurobiological underpinnings.

Conclusion

Auditory brainstem response testing has provided valuable insights into the neurophysiological underpinnings of auditory processing in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder, particularly those with delayed speech development. Abnormalities in ABR, such as prolonged wave latencies and increased interpeak intervals, suggest that auditory brainstem dysfunction may contribute to the speech and language difficulties observed in this population. As research continues to uncover the complexities of ASD, ABR testing may play an increasingly important role in early diagnosis and intervention, ultimately improving outcomes for individuals with ASD and delayed speech development.

1. Tichenor SE, Yaruss JS (2019)J Speech Lang Hear Res 62: 4335-4350.

, ,

2. Jackson ES, Yaruss JS, Quesal RW, Terranova V (2015)J Fluency Disord 45: 38-51.

, ,

3. Crichton I (2002)J Fluency Disord 27: 333-352.

, ,

4. Petrunik M, Shearing CD (1983)Social Prob31: 125-138.

, ,

5. Craig A, Blumgart E, Tran Y (2009)J Fluency Disord34: 61-71.

, ,

6. Arndt J, Healey EC (2001)Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 32: 68-78.

, ,

7. Blood GW, Ridenour VJ, Qualls CD, Hammer CS (2003)J Commun Disord 36: 427-448.

, ,

8. Ntourou K, Conture EG, Lipsey MW (2011)Am J Speech Lang Pathol20: 163-179.

, ,

9. Blood GW, Blood I, Kreiger J, Qualls CD (2009)Commun Disord Quart30: 131-141.

, ,

10. Boulet SL, Boyle CA, Schieve LA (2009)Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 163: 19-26.

, ,