黑料网

Waste poses a trouble to public health and the terrain if it isn’t stored, collected, and disposed of duly. The perception of waste as an unwanted material with no natural value has dominated stations towards disposal. This study investigates the domestic waste practices, waste disposal, and comprehensions about waste and health in an civic community [1].

The study utilised a mixed- system approach. Across-sectional check questionnaire and in- depth interview were used to collect data. An aggregate of 364 ménage heads were canvassed in the check and six crucial snitchers were canvassed with the in- depth interviews [2].

The results of the study revealed that93.1 of homes disposed of food debris as waste and77.8 inclined of plastic accoutrements as waste. The study also showed that61.0 of the homes disposed of their waste at community lockers or had waste picked up at their homes by private contractors. The remaining39.0 inclined of their waste in gutters, thoroughfares, holes and near backwoods [3]. Of those who paid for the services of private contractors, 62.9 weren’t satisfied with the services because of their cost and irregular collection. About 83 of the repliers were apprehensive that indecorous waste operation contributes to complaint occasion; utmost of the repliers allowed that indecorous waste operation could lead to malaria and diarrhoea. There was a general perception that children should be responsible for transporting waste from the homes to jilting spots [4].

The problem of solid, liquid, and poisonous- waste operation in Africa has come with urbanization in the developing world. An important point of the urbanization of the developing world is the rapid-fire growth of metropolises and metropolitan areas. The high rate of urbanization in African countries implies a rapid-fire accumulation of garbage. Social and profitable changes that most African countries have witnessed since the 1960s have also contributed to an increase in the waste generated per capita [5]. As a result, external waste operation constitutes one of the most pivotal health and environmental issues facing directors of African metropolises. Proper waste operation is a public benefit and obligation. Indecorous waste disposal by one individual affects the entire populace, so, as a policy, countries have assigned every existent, establishment or institution to contribute significantly to the process of keeping their communities and terrain clean [6].

As in numerous developing countries, waste operation in Ghana is a complex issue that has been a major issue on the precedence list of consecutive governments, original authorities, and transnational benefactors in recent times. Waste operation is a growing problem in Ghana, and despite large investments that have been made to meet the challenges of effective waste operation in civic Ghana, there’s little substantiation that similar sweats are having their anticipated effect. Although huge capital investment is needed to ameliorate waste operation, social and behavioural factors are also important if waste operation in civic areas is to be successful. It’s in this light that the current study aims to probe community practices and comprehensions about solid waste operation and it counteraccusations for health in civic Accra [7].

The Ga East megacity is composed of foursub-municipalities, videlicet, Madina, Danfa, Taifa, and Dome. It’s bounded in the North by Akuapin’s south quarter, in the West by Ga West, in the East by the Tema megacity, and in the South by Accra Metropolitan Area. It lies in the North-eastern part of the Greater Accra region. The study was conducted in Madina, which is one of the sub-municipalities of the Ga East megacity. Madina is one of the four zonal councils of the Assembly, which is made up of three electoral areas (Nkwantanaa, Tatanaa, and Taatso) having a total population of. This study concentrated on the Nkwantanaa community of Medina, which has an estimated population of. It’s a mixed agreement comprised of high, medium and low- viscosity domestic areas. A aggregate of 39 health installations are located in the quarter. Of these, only 6 are public installations, 31 are private installations, one is operated by the Christian Health Association of Ghana (CHAG) and one is aquasigovernmental health installation. Public services and trading are the dominant occupations in the megacity, followed by husbandry and crafts. A sizeable proportion of the pool in the quarter is jobless, which reflects the high poverty position of the area, and makes numerous people unfit to pay for health services that are available [8].

A aggregate of 364 out of the 400 tried homes responded to the check questionnaire. The coitus of the repliers was nearly unevenly divided, with49.7 being manly and50.3 being womanish. The modal age of the repliers was 31-40 times with40.4 of repliers being in this age group. Nearly half (49.1) of the repliers had introductory education; and38.2 attained a elderly/ advanced educational position, whereas the rest (12.6) had no formal education. About three- diggings (73.4) were employed whilst the remaining26.6 were jobless [9].

The average ménage size was 7 people. Half (50.0) of the repliers surveyed indicated that they had 5 to 9 people living in the same house, whereas31.9 reported having 1 to 4 people living in the same house. The minimal ménage size was 3, while the maximum ménage size was 19. Out of the 364 repliers,74.2 reported they cooked in the house as opposed to25.8 who didn’t cook at home. Not only was the number of repliers who cooked at home high, but the frequency of cooking at home was high. Overall three- diggings (77.8) of the repliers indicated that they cooked at home daily,11.9 cooked at home every other day,5.5 cooked at home three times a week, and4.8 cooked at home weekly. Only 26.1 of study actors said they didn’t have electricity in their houses [10].

Conflict of Interest

None

Acknowledgement

None

1. Giusti L (2009) Waste Management 29(8): 2227-2239.

, ,

2. Nzihou Ange, Lifset Reid (2010) J Ind Ecol 14(2): 196-199.

,          

3. Kaufman Scott M, Krishnan Nikhil, Themelis Nickolas J (2010) Environ Sci Technol 44(15): 5949-5955.

, ,

4. Raj K, Prasad KK, Bansal NK (2006) Nucl Eng Des 236(7): 914-930.

,          

5. Carroll Gregory J, Thurnau Robert C, Fournier Donald J (2012) J Air Waste Manag Assoc 45(9): 730-736.

,          

6. Chen Dezhen, Yin Lijie, Wang Huan, He Pinjing (2014) Waste Management 34(12): 2466-2486.

,          

7. Ding Yin (2021) J Clean Prod 293: 126144.

, ,

8. Abarca Guerrero Lilliana, Maas Ger, Hogland William (2013) Waste Management 33(1): 220-232.

, ,

9. Panagos Panos, Ballabio Cristiano, Lugato Emanuele, Jones Arwyn, Borrelli Pasquale, et al. (2018) Sustainability 10 (7): 2380.

,          

10. Rancon Rick Arneil D, Lin Carol Sze Ki, Chan King Ming, Kwan Tsz Him, Luque Rafael, et al. (2013) Energy Sci Eng 1(2): 53-71.

, ,