ºÚÁÏÍø

Emerging contaminants; Ecotoxicology; Biodiversity; Ecosystem functioning

Introduction

In recent decades; the detection and characterization of emerging contaminants (ECs) in various environmental compartments have raised significant concerns among researchers; policy-makers; and environmental managers. ECs are a broad group of synthetic or naturally occurring chemicals that have been introduced into the environment through human activities; often in ways that were not anticipated at the time of their production. These contaminants typically include pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs); endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs); industrial chemicals; microplastics; nanomaterials; and agricultural runoff. Although these substances were not initially identified as major environmental pollutants; their ubiquitous presence and persistence in ecosystems have prompted a reevaluation of their potential ecological impacts [1].

The traditional approach to environmental contamination focused mainly on well-known pollutants such as heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants (POPs); which have been widely studied and regulated. However; the emerging contaminants often exhibit unique characteristics that complicate their detection; quantification; and regulation. They tend to occur in trace concentrations; often below the detection limits of standard monitoring equipment; and can persist in the environment due to their chemical stability and slow degradation rates. Additionally; many ECs are biologically active; exhibiting hormonal; neurotoxic; or genotoxic effects even at low concentrations [2].

The potential risks of emerging contaminants to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning are of particular concern because they can affect species across different trophic levels; from primary producers to apex predators. For example; EDCs can interfere with reproductive processes in wildlife; while microplastics may pose ingestion risks to marine and terrestrial organisms. Furthermore; the sub-lethal effects of these contaminants; such as altered growth; behavior; and metabolism; can disrupt ecological interactions and ecosystem processes; thereby affecting the services ecosystems provide to humans; such as water purification; pollination; and climate regulation.

This paper aims to explore the ecotoxicological risks posed by emerging contaminants; focusing on their effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. The review examines the mechanisms through which ECs impact organisms; the challenges involved in assessing these impacts; and the broader implications for environmental health and ecosystem stability. Emerging contaminants can affect organisms through a variety of mechanisms; depending on the chemical properties of the pollutants and the sensitivity of the exposed species. The main routes of exposure include direct contact with contaminated water; soil; and sediment; as well as the consumption of contaminated food or water. One of the most significant concerns with many emerging contaminants; particularly pharmaceuticals and personal care products; is their ability to interfere with the endocrine system of wildlife. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can mimic or block the action of natural hormones; leading to altered reproductive cycles; changes in sex ratios; and other physiological abnormalities. For instance; exposure to EDCs such as bisphenol A (BPA) has been shown to cause feminization of male fish and amphibians; resulting in skewed population structures and reduced reproductive success. Another critical pathway of ecotoxicological risk is neurotoxicity. Several emerging contaminants; including pesticides; pharmaceuticals; and industrial chemicals; have been shown to interfere with the nervous system of aquatic and terrestrial organisms. For example; neurotoxic compounds like organophosphate pesticides can impair cognitive function; motor coordination; and predator-prey interactions in fish and invertebrates. Such effects can disrupt the behavior of species and; by extension; alter food webs and ecosystem dynamics. Many ECs are lipophilic and persistent; meaning they can accumulate in the tissues of organisms and biomagnify through trophic levels. For instance; microplastics and nanomaterials can be ingested by a wide range of species; from plankton to fish; and may carry toxic chemicals that become concentrated in higher organisms. Bioaccumulation of ECs can lead to chronic exposure; causing long-term health issues and decreasing reproductive fitness in higher trophic levels. In extreme cases; such accumulation may contribute to population declines and the loss of biodiversity. Beyond direct effects on organisms; ECs can also disrupt key ecological processes such as nutrient cycling and primary productivity. For example; pharmaceuticals and pesticides can alter the microbial communities that are essential for processes like nitrogen fixation; decomposition; and soil fertility. Similarly; pollutants that affect primary producers; such as algae and plants; can reduce primary productivity and affect the entire food chain; compromising ecosystem services like carbon sequestration; water purification; and soil stabilization. Assessing the impacts of emerging contaminants on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning is challenging due to several factors. First; the complexity and variability of environmental systems make it difficult to predict the full scope of ECs' effects. Ecotoxicological testing typically focuses on individual species; but the reality is that ecosystems are highly interconnected; and pollutants may affect multiple species in ways that are not immediately apparent. Most ecotoxicological studies have focused on standardized tests for individual species; often using laboratory-based experiments to assess the lethal and sub-lethal effects of contaminants. However; these tests do not fully capture the complexity of ecological interactions. For example; the effects of a contaminant on a single species may differ when that species is part of a food web or when it interacts with other stressors; such as climate change or habitat destruction. Therefore; more holistic and realistic assessments are required; incorporating field studies and ecosystem-level modeling. An integrated monitoring approach that combines chemical and biological assessments is essential for understanding the risks associated with emerging contaminants. This could involve long-term monitoring of water; soil; and air quality; as well as regular assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem health. Early warning systems; using biomarkers or bioindicator species; could help identify areas at high risk of contamination before broader ecological damage occurs. These systems would need to be adaptable; allowing for rapid response to new contaminants and emerging threats. To improve the accuracy of ecotoxicological assessments; predictive modeling approaches are increasingly being used to simulate the potential effects of contaminants under various environmental conditions. These models can help identify the most vulnerable species and ecosystems; as well as predict the potential long-term consequences of exposure. However; the accuracy of these models depends on the availability of high-quality data on the toxicity; persistence; and fate of ECs in different environments [3-5].

Discussion

The ecotoxicological risks posed by emerging contaminants are wide-ranging and complex; with potential implications for biodiversity conservation; ecosystem health; and human well-being. While progress has been made in identifying and understanding the mechanisms of action of these pollutants; significant challenges remain in assessing their full ecological impact. The complexity of ecosystem responses to ECs means that traditional risk assessment approaches may be insufficient for capturing the full range of effects; particularly when it comes to interactions between different pollutants and ecological factors. One key issue is the gap between the detection of ECs in the environment and their regulation. Many emerging contaminants are not yet subject to strict environmental regulations; and their presence in environmental media is often not monitored comprehensively. This lack of regulatory oversight can lead to undetected accumulation of pollutants in ecosystems; posing risks to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Another challenge is the need for more sensitive and comprehensive methods of detection; which can accurately quantify ECs in trace amounts. Advances in analytical chemistry; such as high-resolution mass spectrometry; may provide more reliable tools for detecting low concentrations of emerging contaminants; but the cost and complexity of these methods may limit their widespread application. Furthermore; the cumulative and synergistic effects of multiple contaminants need to be better understood. Many ecosystems are exposed to a cocktail of pollutants; and the combined effects of these chemicals may be greater than the sum of their individual effects. Understanding the interactions between ECs and other environmental stressors; such as climate change and habitat loss; is critical for assessing the overall risk to biodiversity and ecosystem services [6-10].

Conclusion

Emerging contaminants represent a growing and significant threat to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. These pollutants have the potential to disrupt critical ecological processes; affect species survival and reproduction; and compromise ecosystem services. While progress has been made in understanding the toxicological mechanisms of ECs; there remains a need for more comprehensive and integrated risk assessments that consider both individual species and broader ecosystem dynamics. Advances in monitoring techniques; predictive modeling; and regulatory frameworks are essential to address the emerging challenges posed by these contaminants.

Acknowledgment

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Carthew RW, Sontheimer EJ (2009) . Cell 136: 642–655.

, ,

2. Li C, Zamore PD (2019) . Cold Spring Harbor Protoc 4: 247–262.

, , Crossref

3. Liu S, Jaouannet M, Dempsey DMA, Imani J, Coustau C, et al. (2020) . Biotechnol Adv 39: 107463.

, ,

4. Clancy S (2008) . Nature Education 1: 102.
5. Borges F, Martienssen RA (2015) . Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 16: 727–741.

, , Crossref

6. Obbard DJ, Gordon KHJ, Buck AH, Jiggins FM (2009) . Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 364: 99–115.

, , Crossref

7. Williams M, Clark G, Sathasivan K, Islam AS (2004) . Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology. 1-18.
8. Agrawal N, Dasaradhi PVN, Mohmmed A, Malhotra P, Bhatnagar RK, et al. (2003) . Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67: 657–685.

, , Crossref

9. Chen X, Jiang L, Zheng J, Chen F, Wang T, et al. (2019)  . J Exp Bot 70: 3851-3866.

, ,

10. Wilson RC, Doudna JA (2013) . Annu Rev Biophys 42: 217–239.

, , Crossref