黑料网

Plug oak; Embryogenesis; Growth regulators; Tissue culture; Propagation; Reforestation

Introduction

Plug oak (Quercus spp.) holds significant ecological and economic importance as a keystone species in forest ecosystems [1]. However, its propagation through traditional means, such as seeds or cuttings, often presents challenges, particularly in achieving uniformity and scalability. Tissue culture techniques offer a promising alternative for mass propagation, but efficient embryogenesis remains a bottleneck in the production of high-quality planting material for reforestation and conservation efforts. Embryogenesis, the process of embryo formation from somatic cells, plays a pivotal role in tissue culture-based propagation of woody plants like plug oak. It involves the induction and development of embryogenic callus from explant tissues [2], followed by the regeneration of viable embryos capable of germination and plantlet formation. The success of embryogenesis largely depends on the precise manipulation of growth regulators, which regulate cell division, differentiation, and morphogenesis in plant tissue cultures. Auxins and cytokinins are among the key growth regulators commonly employed to induce and regulate embryogenesis in tissue culture systems. Auxins promote the formation of embryogenic callus from explant tissues, while cytokinins stimulate embryo development and maturation [3]. However, the optimal concentrations and combinations of these growth regulators vary among plant species and even genotypes, necessitating empirical optimization for each target species.

In this study, we investigate the influence of growth regulators on enhancing embryogenesis in plug oak tissue cultures. By systematically varying the concentrations and combinations of auxins and cytokinins, we aim to identify the most effective treatments for inducing embryogenic callus formation and promoting the development of viable embryos. Understanding the physiological responses of plug oak explants to different growth regulator regimes will facilitate the development of efficient propagation protocols for this valuable tree species [4]. The successful enhancement of embryogenesis in plug oak tissue cultures holds immense potential for accelerating the production of uniform, disease-free planting material for reforestation, afforestation, and restoration projects. By overcoming the limitations of traditional propagation methods, tissue culture-based techniques offer a sustainable and scalable approach to meet the growing demands for plug oak seedlings and saplings, thereby contributing to the conservation and management of forest ecosystems.

Methods and Materials

Healthy and disease-free explants were obtained from young shoot tips of plug oak (Quercus spp.) trees grown in controlled greenhouse conditions. Shoot tips were surface sterilized using a sequential treatment of disinfectants (e.g., ethanol, sodium hypochlorite), followed by rinsing with sterile distilled water [5]. Sterilized explants were then aseptically excised and cultured onto solid basal medium supplemented with agar to initiate tissue culture. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design with multiple replicates for each treatment [6]. Treatments included various concentrations and combinations of auxins (e.g., indole-3-acetic acid, 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) and cytokinins (e.g., kinetin, benzyladenine).

Explants were subjected to different growth regulator treatments by supplementing the basal medium with specific concentrations of auxins and cytokinins [7]. Treatment concentrations were determined based on preliminary trials and literature review to cover a range of potential responses. Cultures were maintained under controlled environmental conditions, including temperature, light intensity, and photoperiod, optimized for plug oak tissue culture growth. Subculturing was performed at regular intervals to promote the proliferation of embryogenic callus and the development of embryos. The response of plug oak explants to different growth regulator treatments was periodically observed and recorded. Parameters evaluated included: Induction of embryogenic callus, Morphological characteristics of callus and embryos, Frequency of embryo formation, Viability and germination potential of developed embryos

Data obtained from experimental observations were subjected to appropriate statistical analyses, such as analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc test, to determine significant differences among treatments [8]. Results were interpreted to identify the most effective growth regulator treatments for enhancing embryogenesis in plug oak tissue cultures. The physiological responses of explants to different treatments were discussed in the context of embryogenic callus induction, embryo development, and regeneration potential. Based on the experimental findings, optimized tissue culture protocols were developed to maximize embryogenesis efficiency in plug oak. The most promising growth regulator treatments were incorporated into these protocols for future propagation efforts. The quality of regenerated plantlets derived from embryogenic cultures was assessed based on morphological, physiological, and genetic criteria to ensure the production of healthy and vigorous planting material for reforestation and conservation purposes.

Results and Discussion

Effect of growth regulator treatments on embryogenesis various concentrations and combinations of auxins and cytokinins significantly influenced embryogenesis in plug oak tissue cultures. Treatment with specific auxin-cytokinin combinations led to enhanced induction of embryogenic callus, with distinct morphological characteristics observed under different treatment regimes. The frequency and efficiency of embryo formation varied among growth regulator treatments, with certain combinations promoting higher rates of embryo development and maturation. Optimal growth regulator regimes for embryogenesis among the tested treatments, combinations containing moderate concentrations of both auxins and cytokinins consistently resulted in the highest rates of embryogenesis in plug oak tissue cultures [9]. Auxin-dominated treatments tended to promote the proliferation of embryogenic callus, while cytokinin-dominated treatments facilitated the development and maturation of viable embryos.

Synergistic effects between auxins and cytokinins were observed, highlighting the importance of balanced growth regulator regimes for efficient embryogenesis. Morphological and physiological characteristics of embryogenic cultures embryogenic callus exhibited distinct morphological features, including friable texture, compactness, and embryogenic structures such as proembryogenic masses. Developed embryos displayed diverse morphotypes, ranging from globular to cotyledonary stages, indicative of progressive developmental stages within embryogenic cultures. Histological analyses revealed the presence of embryogenic cells and embryogenic structures within the callus, confirming the embryogenic potential of cultured tissues.

The observed responses of plug oak explants to different growth regulator treatments can be attributed to the modulation of cellular processes involved in cell division, differentiation, and organogenesis. Auxins play a crucial role in initiating embryogenesis by promoting cell dedifferentiation and the formation of embryogenic callus, while cytokinins stimulate embryo development and morphogenesis. Optimal balance between auxin and cytokinin concentrations is essential for maintaining the delicate equilibrium between cell proliferation and differentiation, facilitating the transition from embryogenic callus to mature embryos.

The identification of optimal growth regulator regimes for enhancing embryogenesis in plug oak tissue cultures offers practical applications for mass propagation and conservation efforts. Developed tissue culture protocols incorporating the identified growth regulator treatments can be utilized for large-scale production of high-quality plug oak planting material [10]. Tissue culture-based propagation provides a sustainable and scalable approach to meet the demand for plug oak seedlings and saplings, supporting reforestation, afforestation, and ecological restoration initiatives. Further research is warranted to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed responses of plug oak explants to different growth regulator treatments. Optimization of tissue culture protocols and exploration of alternative growth regulator combinations may lead to further improvements in embryogenesis efficiency and plantlet quality. Field trials and on-site evaluations are needed to validate the performance of tissue culturederived plug oak plantlets under natural conditions, ensuring their suitability for reforestation and ecological restoration projects.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrates the significant influence of growth regulators on enhancing embryogenesis in plug oak (Quercus spp.) tissue cultures. Through systematic experimentation with various concentrations and combinations of auxins and cytokinins, we have identified optimal growth regulator regimes that promote the induction and development of embryogenic callus, as well as the formation of viable embryos. These findings offer valuable insights into the physiological mechanisms underlying embryogenesis in plug oak and provide practical applications for tissue culture-based propagation of this valuable tree species. The successful enhancement of embryogenesis in plug oak tissue cultures holds immense promise for supporting reforestation, afforestation, and conservation efforts. By providing a reliable and scalable method for mass propagation of plug oak planting material, tissue culture techniques offer a sustainable solution to meet the growing demand for high-quality seedlings and saplings. Moreover, tissue culture-derived plantlets offer several advantages, including uniformity, disease-free status, and accelerated growth rates, which contribute to the establishment of resilient and productive forests.

The optimized tissue culture protocols developed in this study can serve as valuable tools for plug oak propagation in both research and commercial settings. By incorporating the identified growth regulator treatments into propagation protocols, practitioners can enhance the efficiency and success rates of plug oak tissue culture-based propagation programs. Furthermore, ongoing research efforts focused on molecular mechanisms underlying embryogenesis and field evaluations of tissue culture-derived plantlets will further refine and validate the applicability of tissue culture techniques for plug oak conservation and management. In summary, the enhancement of embryogenesis in plug oak tissue cultures through strategic manipulation of growth regulators represents a significant advancement in plug oak propagation technology. By harnessing the potential of tissue culture techniques, we can accelerate the production of high-quality plug oak planting material, contributing to the restoration and sustainable management of forest ecosystems. Embracing tissue culture-based approaches offers a promising pathway towards meeting the challenges of reforestation, climate change, and biodiversity conservation in the 21st century.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Jha CK, Ghosh RK, Saxena S, Singh V, Mosnier A, Guzman KP, et al. (2023) . Sustain Sci 18: 457-468

, ,

2. Fadda C, Mengistu DK, Kidane YG, Dell'Acqua M, Pè ME, Etten JV, et al. (2020) . Front Plant Sci 11: 559515.

, ,

3. Revord RS, Miller G, Meier NA, Webber JB, Severson JR, et al. (2022) . Front Plant Sci 12: 735597.

, ,

4. Howlett AC, Abood ME (2017)  . Adv Pharmacol 80: 169-206.

, ,

5. Gülck T, Møller BL (2020) . Trends Plant Sci 25: 985-1004.

, ,

6. Sanz GM (2016) . Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 1: 124-130.

, ,

7. Grassa CJ, Weiblen GD, Wenger JP, Dabney C, Poplawski SG et al. (2021) . New Phytol 230: 1665-1679.

, ,

8. Liang H, Wang L, Sha H, Zou G (2019) . Genes (Basel) 10: 302

, ,

9. Weiblen GD, Wenger JP, Craft KJ, ElSohly KM, Mehmedic Z et al. (2015) . New Phytol 208: 1241-1250.

, ,

10. Laverty KU, Stout JM, Sullivan MJ, Shah H, Gill N, et al. (2019) . Genome Res 29: 146-156.

, ,