黑料网

GPS; Crustal deformation; Imphal valley; MPGO

GPS site, data processing and analysis

The continuously operating GPS permanent station at Multi- Parametric Geophysical Observatory (MPGO), Imphal (Figure 1) was installed in 2014. The station is located on a hill within the campus of Langthabal Khoupum, Imphal West. The station is located on a pillar approximately 7 m high and is rooted in the outcropping Disang formation. It is equipped with a Net R9 receiver and a Trimble Choke ring antenna. The Antenna is fixed on an 8 feet high RCC pillar and the receiver and battery are housed in a small nearby shed. The receiver is powered by the AC as well as through batteries which are charged using the solar panels (Figure 2) operational from September 2014.

Figure 1: Permanent GPS Station at Multi-Parametric Geophysical Observatory (MPGO), Imphal.

Figure 2: Schematic representation of GPS Permanent Station, GPS instrument and its associated flowchart.

The GPS data obtained from the site have been converted into RINEX observation files and quality check was performed using TEQC (Translation, Editing and Quality Checking Software). The quality check plots of all the GPS data were carefully examined and the data with high cycle clips, multipath and of duration with <18 hours observation were removed from the analysis.

The processing of the GPS data from station is routinely performed at Department of Earth Sciences Manipur University using the GAMIT/ GLOBK software [3-5]. Data from IGS (International GPS Service) sites, namely, BAHR, IISC, HYDE, LHAS, KIT3, KUNM and POL2. These data were processed on daily basis producing loosely constrained station coordinates and satellite orbits. These were further combined with loosely constrained solutions of globally distributed nearby IGS station data available from the Scripps Orbital and Positioning Analysis Centre (SOPAC; http:garner.ucsd.edu). Using the GLOBK software [3], position estimates and velocity stabilization in ITRF08 were achieved [6].

Time series 2016-2018 of IMP1 site is shown in Figure 3. In the time series north component shows deformation 21.1±0.5 mm/yr, east component shows deformation 30.2±0.5 mm/yr.

Figure 3: Time series at IMP1 in ITRF2008.

In ITRF2008 reference frame the IMP1 site shows a velocity of 36.3 mm/year towards N55° (Figure 4). This velocity is significantly less than the velocity of Indian plate which is about 52 mm/year towards N52°. We use the Euler pole estimated by Banerjee [7] (2008) for representing the Indian plate motion. In Indian reference frame, the IMP1 site moves at a velocity of about 16.7 mm/year towards N222°, i.e. towards southwest (Figure 5).

Figure 4: Velocity plot at IMP1 in ITRF2008.

Figure 5: Velocity plot at IMP1 in Indian reference frame.

It implies that the difference in motion between the Indian plate and the IMP1 site is accommodated somewhere west of the IMP1 site. One of the immediate deductions from these results is that the site IMP1 is not located on the Indian plate. The site is actually located on the Burma plate and the velocity with reference to the Indian plate provides a constraint on the motion accommodated at the plate boundary fault located between the India and Burma plate [8].

Acknowledgement

Financial assistance provided by Ministry of Earth Sciences and Ministry of Science & Technology Government of India to carry out the present investigations is thankfully acknowledged.

1. Akilan A, Balaji S, Malaimani EC, Ravikumar N, et al. (2012) . J Ind Geophys Union 16(1):21-28.

, ,

2. Banerjee P, Bürgmann R, Nagarajan B, Apel E, et al.  (2008) . Geophys Res Lett 35.

, ,

3. Banner D H (1981) . Int J Earth Sc 70:446-458.

, ,

4. Herring TA (2005) . Mass Inst of Technol Cambridge.
5. Herring TA, King RW, McClusky SC (2010) . Mass Inst of Technol Cambridge.
6. Herring TA, King RW, McClusky SC (2010) . Mass Inst of Technol Cambridge.
7. Nandy DR (2001) . ACB Publication 91(2):248-248.

,

8. Laishram Sunil Singh, Gahalaut VK, Arun Kumar (2014) . J Geol Soc India 83:513-516.

, ,