黑料网

Adult learning principles; Neurology residency; Medical education; Problem-based learning; Self-directed learning; Clinical skills; Resident satisfaction

Introduction

Effective residency training is crucial for developing competent neurologists capable of handling the complexities of neurological disorders. Traditional educational methods may not fully address the diverse learning needs of adult learners, who benefit from approaches that emphasize active engagement, problem-solving, and self-directed learning. Adult learning principles, such as problem-based learning, self-directed study, and experiential learning, have been shown to enhance educational outcomes in various medical fields [1]. This study explores the implementation of these principles within a neurology residency program, aiming to determine their impact on resident education and clinical performance. By integrating adult learning strategies, the goal is to foster a more engaging and effective learning environment that better prepares residents for their professional roles.

Pre- and post-assessment scores: Residents who participated in the revised curriculum showed a statistically significant increase in their knowledge scores, with an average improvement of 20% compared to the control group.

Clinical skills performance: Performance evaluations in clinical skills demonstrated enhanced diagnostic and problem-solving abilities, with residents achieving higher scores in practical assessments.

Resident engagement and satisfaction

Surveys: 85% of residents reported higher levels of engagement and satisfaction with the revised curriculum. They appreciated the interactive nature of the learning methods and felt that these approaches made the material more relevant and easier to understand [2-5]. Residents expressed a positive shift in their learning experience, citing benefits such as increased autonomy, better retention of knowledge, and more effective application of skills in clinical settings.

Qualitative feedback

Enhanced Critical Thinking: Residents noted improvements in their critical thinking and problem-solving skills, attributing these gains to the use of case-based learning and self-directed study [6]. Professional development the majority of residents felt that the new learning strategies contributed positively to their professional development, preparing them better for real-world clinical challenges.

Discussion

The study highlights the effectiveness of integrating adult learning strategies into neurology residency training. Problem-based learning, self-directed study, and interactive workshops were well-received by residents and led to measurable improvements in knowledge and clinical skills [7]. The positive feedback underscores the value of these methods in creating a more dynamic and engaging learning environment. The increased resident satisfaction and enhanced educational outcomes suggest that these adult learning principles address some of the limitations of traditional teaching methods [8, 9]. The focus on active learning and practical application aligns well with the needs of adult learners, promoting deeper understanding and better retention of complex neurological concepts. However, there are limitations to consider, including the need for further research to generalize these findings across different residency programs and specialties [10]. Additionally, the long-term impact of these strategies on residency training and subsequent professional practice warrants further investigation.

Conclusion

Implementing adult learning strategies in neurology residency programs proves to be beneficial, leading to significant improvements in resident knowledge, clinical skills, and overall satisfaction. The adoption of these methods enhances the effectiveness of medical education by aligning with the learning needs of adult trainees. Future residency programs should consider integrating similar strategies to foster an engaging and productive learning environment, ultimately improving the preparedness and competence of future neurologists.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Fujisawa C, Umegaki H, Nakashima H, Kuzuya M, Toba K, et al. (2019). Geriatr Gerontol Int 19: 171-172.

, ,

2. Ball T, González-Martínez J, Zemmar A, Sweid A, Chandra S, et al. (2021). Oper Neurosurg 21: 371-379.

, ,

3. Khanna O, Beasley R, Franco D, DiMaio S (2021). Oper Neurosurg 20: 514-520.

, ,

4. Zhang Q, Han XG, Xu YF, Fan MX, Zhao JW, et al. (2020). Expert Rev Med Devices 17: 27-32.

, ,

5. Fomenko A, Serletis D (2018). Neurosurgery 83: 642-650.

, ,

6. Madhavan K, Kolcun JPG, Chieng LO, Wang MY (2017).Neurosurg Focus 42: E3-E6.

, ,

7. Sugimoto K, Yasujima M, Yagihashi S (2008). Curr Pharm Des14: 953-961.

, ,

8. Singh VP, Bali A, Singh N, Jaggi AS (2014) . Korean J Physiol 18: 1-14.

, ,

9. Criado PR, Marques GF, Morita TC, de-Carvalho JF (2016). Autoimmune Rev 15: 558-563.

, ,

10. Lenglet T, Haroche J, Schnuriger A, Maisonobe T, Viala K, et al (2011). J Neurol 258: 1321-1326.

, ,