黑料网

Clostridium botulinum; Food safety; Innovative approaches; High Pressure Processing (HPP); Non-thermal plasma; Ultraviolet light

Introduction

Clostridium botulinum, a notorious bacterium that produces the potent botulinum neurotoxin, is a significant concern in the food industry due to its ability to cause severe and potentially lethal foodborne illnesses. As the demand for safe and minimally processed foods grows, so does the need for innovative methods to effectively manage Clostridium botulinum hazards in various food products. In recent years, advancements in technology and research have led to the development of novel approaches that offer enhanced control over this dangerous pathogen. This article explores some of these innovative strategies and their potential to revolutionize food safety practices [1].

Among physical food treatments, heating is the principal and traditional method of microbial inactivation. Furthermore, the spores of C. botulinum are the reference point for establishing thermal treatment efficiency scales for low-acid canned foods. These heat treatment benefits come with some undesired effects on food, though, such as changes in the physicochemical properties and organoleptic characteristics. Therefore, alternative technologies have always been in demand in order to conserve these product properties while inactivating the C. botulinum hazard [2]. Ionizing radiation was tested for food safety in the 1960s, and since then, there have been many recent advances in other nonthermal technologies, such as high-pressure processing (HPP), cold plasma (CP), pulsed electric field (PEF), intense light pulses (ILP), ultraviolet (UV), ultrasound waves, etc. Understanding and analyzing the specific mode of action of different technologies aids in the design and implementation of strategies for exploiting their potential cumulative or synergistic effects in order to control the C. botulinum hazard in food products.

High pressure processing

High Pressure Processing involves subjecting foods to high pressures, which inactivates the vegetative cells and spores of Clostridium botulinum. This technique preserves the nutritional quality of foods while ensuring microbial safety, making it a promising option for ready-to-eat and minimally processed foods [3].

Non-thermal plasma treatment

Non-thermal plasma treatment generates reactive species that effectively destroy microbial cells and spores. This approach has shown promise in inactivating Clostridium botulinum in packaging materials and food surfaces, reducing the risk of contamination during processing and packaging.

Ultraviolet (UV) light

UV light can damage the DNA of microorganisms, including Clostridium botulinum, rendering them unable to reproduce. UV light technology can be integrated into food processing lines to target potential contamination points and reduce the risk of toxin production [4, 5].

Novel packaging solutions

Incorporating antimicrobial agents or oxygen scavengers into packaging materials can create an inhospitable environment for Clostridium botulinum. Modified atmosphere packaging and vacuum packaging, when combined with appropriate barriers, can extend shelf life while mitigating the risk of botulinum toxin formation.

Advanced thermal processing

Traditional heat treatments can be augmented with advanced technologies like microwave or ohmic heating. These methods allow for uniform heat distribution, ensuring that even the most heatresistant spores of Clostridium botulinum are effectively destroyed.

Heating damages C. botulinum vegetative cells depending on various factors before, during, or after the treatment. Before the treatment, the stage of growth can influence the bacterial cells’ resistance to heat, e.g., exponentially growing cells are usually more sensitive to heat than cells in the stationary phase of growth [51]. Exposure to different sublethal stresses such as growth temperature and media characteristics (type, composition, pH, and aw), before or during treatment, activates the resistance mechanisms in bacteria which can contribute to cross- resistance and increase the thermotolerance of bacterial cells [6, 7].

During treatment, the heat intensity and the characteristics of the treatment medium influence the thermosensitivity of bacteria.

Probiotics and competitive exclusion

Certain strains of beneficial bacteria can out compete Clostridium botulinum in the gut environment, limiting its growth and toxin production. Incorporating such probiotics into foods may offer a natural and preventative means of controlling the pathogen's proliferation [8].

Predictive modeling and data analytics

Sophisticated mathematical models and data analytics can predict the growth and toxin production of Clostridium botulinum under various conditions. This information empowers food processors to tailor processing parameters for maximum safety without compromising product quality [9].

Discussion

The management of Clostridium botulinum in the food industry has undergone a transformative shift with the emergence of innovative approaches that promise to enhance food safety while addressing the demand for minimally processed products. The exploration of such methods reflects a dynamic response to the challenges posed by this bacterium and its potent neurotoxins.

High Pressure Processing (HPP) emerges as a versatile technique, effectively inactivating both vegetative cells and spores of Clostridium botulinum. Its ability to ensure microbiological safety while preserving the nutritional quality of foods positions it as a critical tool for readyto- eat and minimally processed foods [10]. Similarly, non-thermal plasma treatment showcases its potential to mitigate contamination risks during packaging and processing stages. By generating reactive species that disrupt microbial cells and spores, it adds an extra layer of security to food safety protocols.

Ultraviolet (UV) light technology and novel packaging solutions signify pivotal steps toward preventing the growth and toxin production of Clostridium botulinum. The ability of UV light to damage microbial DNA and the incorporation of antimicrobial agents in packaging materials underscore their potential to create inhospitable environments for the pathogen. These approaches extend the shelf life of products while reducing the risk of botulinum toxin formation.

Advanced thermal processing methods, such as microwave and ohmic heating, have the capacity to eradicate even the most heatresistant spores of Clostridium botulinum. Their integration into food processing lines ensures uniform heat distribution, elevating the efficiency of pathogen control [11]. Probiotics and competitive exclusion present natural avenues for managing this bacterium through competitive inhibition, potentially reshaping the landscape of foodborne pathogen management.

Conclusion

In the relentless pursuit of safer food products, the food industry continues to embrace innovative solutions to combat Clostridium botulinum hazards. These advancements not only ensure the microbiological safety of foods but also enable the production of minimally processed products that retain their nutritional and sensory qualities. As technology evolves and scientific understanding deepens, the arsenal of tools available for managing Clostridium botulinum risks will continue to expand, safeguarding consumers from the threat of botulism while offering a broader array of food choices. C. botulinum spores are generally resistant to HPP. However, the combination of thermal and HPP treatments has shown promising results in effectively inactivating spores in different food products. As a non-thermal alternative, the combination of HPP and irradiation can also be used to exert synergistic effects for inactivating C. botulinum.

Pulsed electric fields, intense light pulses, cold plasma, and other emerging technologies are still new to the food safety industry. There is limited research on the ability of these technologies to control C. botulinum in food. Therefore, one way to move forward is to research the application of these technologies on model or surrogate bacteria which will ultimately increase our confidence in the extrapolation of these results to C. botulinum.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Kim C, Bushlaibi M, Alrefaei R., Ndegwa E, Kaseloo P, et al. (2019) Food Sci Nutr 7: 2033–2042.

, , Crossref

2. Peck MW (2006)  J Appl Microbiol 101: 556–570.

, , Crossref

3. Sugiyama H (1951) J Bacteriol 62: 81–96.

, , Crossref

4. Lenz CA, Vogel RF (2014) Food Microbiol 44:156–167.

, , Crossref

5. Chowdhury MS, Rowley DB, Anellis A, Levinson HS (1976) Appl Environ Microbiol 32: 172–178.

, , Crossref

6. Huhtanen CN (1991)  J Food Prot 54: 894–896.

, , Crossref

7. Postmes T, van den Bogaard AE, Hazen M (1995)  Experientia 51: 986–989.

, , Crossref

8. Kempe LL, Graikoski JT (1962)  Appl Microbiol 10: 31–36.

, , Crossref

9. Durban E, Grecz N (1969) Appl Microbiol 18: 44–50.

, , Crossref

10. Rose SA, Modi NK, Tranter HS, Bailey NE, Stringer MF (1998) J Appl Bacteriol 65: 223–229.

, , Crossref

11. Costilow RN (1962) J Bacteriol 84: 1268–1273.

, , Crossref