黑料网

Journal of Dental Science and Medicine
黑料网

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ 黑料网 Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

黑料网 Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Commentary   
  • J Dent Sci Med 2022, Vol 5(1): 141
  • DOI: 10.4172/did.1000141

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Susceptibility Artifacts caused by Crowns of Various Materials with prepared Teeth and Titanium Implants

Shintaro Sukegawa*
Department of Stomatology, Central South University, China
*Corresponding Author: Shintaro Sukegawa, Department of Stomatology, Xiangya Hospita, Central South University, China, Email: shintaro@gmail.com

Received: 13-Jan-2022 / Manuscript No. did-22-51657 / Editor assigned: 15-Jan-2022 / PreQC No. did-22-51657 / Reviewed: 29-Jan-2022 / QC No. did-22-51657 / Revised: 03-Feb-2022 / Manuscript No. did-22-51657 / Accepted Date: 09-Feb-2022 / Published Date: 10-Feb-2022 DOI: 10.4172/did.1000141

Commentary

This study aimed to check out the artifacts induced by crowns composed of special substances with organized teeth and titanium implants. Resin, metal-ceramic, ceramic and zirconia crowns have been fabricated and positioned onto the organized enamel on a human cadaver head or titanium implants with prosthesis abutments on a dry human mandible.

Head and neck MRI serves as the most regularly used auxiliary examination for diagnosing tumors and different lesions in the maxillofacial region. To look into the feasible artifacts produced by way of oral prosthesis in MRI, we protected commonly-used crowns with 9 extraordinary substances and titanium implants to examine the susceptibility artifacts. The speculation was once now not rejected in our investigation. Resin, ceramic, zirconia and valuable metal-ceramic crowns should produce few artifacts on the organized teeth. However, when blended with titanium implants, Au-Pt and Ag-Pd metal-ceramic crowns would limit the artifacts that titanium implants produced [1]. Artifact dimension used to be accelerated in Pure Ti, Ti alloy, Ni–Cr and Co-Cr metal-ceramic crowns.

1.5 T MRI is clinically used for the assessment of the oral tissue, and this method was once suggested to motive fewer susceptibility artifacts than three T MRI does at the identical imaging parameters for the frequent dental materials. Therefore, 1.5 T MRI used to be utilized in the experiment. The susceptibility artifacts of single-metal objects in dentistry have been investigated the use of in vitro fashions or a porcine jaw. A preceding learn about has investigated the artifacts precipitated by way of 4 types of cylindrically formed materials. It labeled resin, glass ionomer cement as absolutely like-minded materials, amalgam, gold alloy, gold-ceramic materials, titanium inflicting comparatively robust distortions as like-minded substances and metal orthodontic home equipment and Co-Cr as non-compatible materials. The resin, zirconia, ceramic and treasured metal-ceramic crowns exhibited almost no artifacts in accordance to our investigation. By contrast, the pure Ti metal-ceramic produced average artifacts and nonprecious metalceramic crowns on the organized enamel created severely distorted images. In the transverse plane, there was once a limit in sign density at the lingual issue of the crowns and an amplify at the buccal facet triggered by way of the Ti alloy porcelain crowns [2]. The distortion patterns had been comparable in the Co-Cr and Ni–Cr metal-ceramic crowns with large areas. The artifacts have been positively related with the variety of prosthesis. These outcomes have been regular with these of previous studies.

For the implants placement, we used a dry human mandible with gelatine to create environment comparable to these of the oral cavity. Given the consistency of gelatine in the phantom, a crown can be located, and the impact of interference with air can be eliminated. Titanium implants should generate reasonable artifacts with round low-dense sign at each the lingual and buccal elements and highdense sign at lingual sides. A current find out about has additionally investigated the artifacts caused by way of titanium implants of special diameters and height. The lookup located that titanium implants ought to generate round or “clover-like” artifacts, which used to be in consistence with our results [3].

When full crowns had been blended with titanium implants and abutments, special outcomes have been located in contrast with organized teeth. Significant artifacts had been detected in the crown airplane in MRI regardless of the cloth of the full crowns. The resin crowns caused full-size sign voids in the crown aircraft with the titanium implants and abutments, whereas no artifacts have been found in resin crowns with the organized teeth. The non-uniformity of the outcomes in the tooth-supported crew and the implant-supported crew ought to be attributed to the distinction in susceptibility between organized enamel and titanium abutments. The effects counseled that titanium abutments altered the precession frequencies of protons and prompted the sign loss and spatial distortions at the adjoining areas. In our study, the inconspicuous artifacts had been detected in the implant airplane however apparent picture distortion was once proven in the crown plane. That was once in all likelihood due to the fact the disparity in susceptibility between dental substances and surrounding environments had been different, as the titanium implant used to be surrounded through mandibular alveolar bone and the higher restorations had been surrounded with the aid of gelatine [4].

This learns about is characterised by way of some limitations. A dry human mandible and surrounding gelatine have been utilized to examine the artifacts caused by way of titanium implants and crowns. Gelatine should now not symbolize the anatomic constructions in vivo and the susceptibility of gelatine and oral cavity used to be now not identical, which may compromise the results. There was once solely one set of crowns of distinct materials. More repetition for the substances ought to be protected in the in addition research. A small area of view (FOV) used to be utilized in this study, as a smaller FOV induces much less susceptibility artifacts. A large and extra clinicallyrelevant FOV ought to be protected in the future study. Besides, the scanning parameters may also have an impact on the artifact dimension however solely one sequence used to be utilized in the study. More MRI scanning parameters are wished in the future. Only 1.5 T MRI was once investigated in our find out about and greater researches on three T MRI must be covered to get an extra complete result. Besides, the artifact areas have been measured with the aid of one professional, which may purpose some random errors. Further validation in sufferers investigations with two or extra investigators inspecting the pix are required in this matter.

In conclusion, resin, zirconia, ceramic, treasured metal-ceramic crowns barely produce susceptibility artifacts with organized enamel and nonprecious metal-ceramic crowns would generate sign loss at the lingual element of the crowns and an expand at the buccal aspect and the artifacts would intervene with the buccal mucosa and tongue [5]. After titanium implants insertion, round sign voids have been generated, whereas Au-Pt and Ag-Pd metal-ceramic crowns should alleviate the susceptibility artifacts.

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank Department of Stomatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China for giving me an opportunity to do research.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References

  1. Junn JC, Soderlund KA, Glastonbury CM (2021) . Semin Nucl Med 51: 3-12.
  2. , ,

  3. Schenck JF (1996) . Med Phys 23: 815-850.
  4. , Google Scholar,

  5. Shafiei F, Honda E, Takahashi H, Sasaki T (2003) J Dent Res 82: 602-606. 
  6. , ,

  7. Xi D, Wong L (2021) . J Biol Regul Homeostat Agents 35: 63-72.
  8. ,

  9. Starcukova J, Starcuk Z Jr, Hubalkova H, Linetskiy I (2008) . Dent Mater 24: 715-723. 
  10. , ,

Citation: Sukegawa S (2022) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Susceptibility Artifacts caused by Crowns of Various Materials with prepared Teeth and Titanium Implants. Dent Implants Dentures 5: 141. DOI: 10.4172/did.1000141

Copyright: © 2022 Sukegawa S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

International Conferences 2024-25
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global

Conferences by Country

Medical & Clinical Conferences

Conferences By Subject

Top