ºÚÁÏÍø

Pesticide degradation; Soil contamination; Water contamination; Microbial consortia; Enzymatic breakdown; Genetically engineered microorganisms; Plant-based bioremediation; Environmental toxicity

Introduction

The widespread use of pesticides in agriculture, industry, and public health has led to significant contamination of soil and water resources. Pesticides, including herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and nematicides, are designed to be chemically stable and effective at controlling pests, but their persistence in the environment raises concerns about their impact on ecosystems, biodiversity, and human health. Many pesticides have been classified as hazardous substances due to their toxicity, ability to bioaccumulate in food chains, and potential to disrupt aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems [1]. Traditional methods for pesticide removal, such as chemical degradation, physical adsorption, and filtration, are often costly, energy-intensive, and may introduce secondary pollutants into the environment. Additionally, these methods tend to be ineffective for handling large-scale contamination or dealing with the complex mixture of pesticides present in contaminated sites. In contrast, bioremediation the use of biological systems to detoxify or degrade pollutants has emerged as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative for pesticide removal. Bioremediation utilizes the natural abilities of microorganisms, plants, or their enzymes to degrade toxic chemicals into less harmful products [2]. Among bioremediation approaches, microbial degradation of pesticides is one of the most promising methods due to the diverse metabolic pathways exhibited by microorganisms, which can break down even highly persistent pesticides. Additionally, plants have been utilized in phytoremediation to remove or transform pesticides from contaminated soil and water through mechanisms like absorption, translocation, and biodegradation.

This review focuses on novel bioremediation strategies for pesticide degradation, specifically examining the use of genetically engineered microorganisms, microbial consortia, and enzyme-based treatments. Furthermore, bioreactor systems and plant-based remediation techniques are discussed as methods for improving the efficiency and scalability of pesticide degradation. The goal of this article is to highlight innovative, emerging approaches to bioremediation that can be applied to pesticide-contaminated environments and to identify the challenges that need to be addressed in order to make these techniques viable for large-scale applications [3]. Understanding the mechanisms behind these novel strategies will be crucial for the development of more efficient, environmentally friendly, and sustainable solutions to combat pesticide pollution and reduce the risks posed by these persistent contaminants.

Methodology

This review article is based on an extensive literature survey of recent advancements in the field of pesticide degradation through bioremediation techniques. The methodology for this review can be outlined as follows:

Literature search: A comprehensive search of scientific databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus was conducted to identify research articles, reviews, and case studies on bioremediation of pesticide-contaminated soil and water. Keywords like bioremediation, pesticide degradation, microbial consortia, phytoremediation, genetically engineered microorganisms, and enzyme-based degradation were used to filter relevant studies [4].

Selection of relevant studies: Studies focused on bioremediation of pesticide contaminants in soil and water. Research that discusses innovative or novel approaches to pesticide degradation, including microbial consortia, genetically engineered microorganisms, and plant-based techniques  [5]. Case studies or field trials that report on the practical applications and effectiveness of bioremediation methods for pesticide removal.

Data extraction: Type of pesticides targeted (e.g., herbicides, insecticides, fungicides). Bioremediation techniques employed (e.g., microbial degradation, enzymatic breakdown, phytoremediation). Microorganisms used (including genetically engineered strains and microbial consortia). Efficiency of degradation (e.g., percentage reduction in pesticide concentration). Environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, pH, pollutant concentration, and exposure time). Challenges faced (e.g., scalability, environmental limitations, regulatory issues).

Synthesis and analysis: The findings were analyzed and synthesized to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art approaches in pesticide bioremediation. The effectiveness, advantages, and limitations of different bioremediation strategies were compared, along with the identification of emerging trends and gaps in current research [6].

Results and Discussion

Microbial degradation of pesticides: Microbial degradation remains one of the most studied and effective bioremediation approaches for pesticide contamination. Several microbial species, including Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Rhodococcus, have been identified as potent degraders of a wide range of pesticides. For example: Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been shown to degrade organophosphate pesticides like chlorpyrifos through enzymatic activity (e.g., organophosphorus hydrolases). Bacillus subtilis and Rhodococcus spp. have been reported to degrade herbicides such as atrazine and glyphosate by breaking down complex aromatic compounds and dechlorinating toxic molecules [7]. Moreover, the use of genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) has improved the degradation efficiency of recalcitrant pesticides. Strains of Pseudomonas engineered to express additional pesticide-degrading enzymes have demonstrated enhanced capabilities for breaking down complex compounds at faster rates compared to wild-type strains.

Microbial consortia: Recent studies have shown that using microbial consortia a mixture of different microorganisms that work together synergistically can significantly enhance the degradation of pesticides. For example: A consortium of Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, and Bacillus was found to effectively degrade a mixture of organophosphates and chlorinated pesticides [8]. The consortia utilize different metabolic pathways to break down various pesticide residues, thereby increasing the overall efficiency of bioremediation.

Phytoremediation: Plant-based bioremediation, or phytoremediation, has also gained attention for its potential in removing pesticides from soil and water. Plants such as Triticum aestivum (wheat), Brassica spp. (mustard), and Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin) have been used for the phytoremediation of pesticide-contaminated soil. These plants are capable of absorbing pesticides, translocating them to their aerial parts, or degrading them in their roots. In some cases, endophytic bacteria within plant tissues play a crucial role in enhancing pesticide degradation, offering a dual mechanism of phytoremediation and bacterial bioremediation.

Enzymatic degradation: Enzymes such as laccases, peroxidases, and hydrolases produced by microorganisms have been employed in enzyme-based bioremediation for pesticide degradation. These enzymes facilitate the breakdown of pesticide molecules by catalyzing oxidative or hydrolytic reactions [9]. For example, bacterial laccases can oxidize a wide range of pesticides, including atrazine and chlorpyrifos, while esterases help degrade organophosphates. The use of immobilized enzymes in bioreactor systems has shown to be an effective and scalable approach for in situ pesticide degradation in contaminated water and soils.

Bioreactor systems: Bioreactors, where microbial or plant-based bioremediation processes are performed under controlled conditions, have been used in large-scale applications for pesticide removal. Bioreactor-based systems have been particularly effective for treating water contaminated with pesticides [10]. For example, a bioreactor using engineered Pseudomonas strains was able to reduce pesticide concentrations in wastewater by up to 80% within 72 hours under optimal conditions.

Conclusion

Novel bioremediation strategies for the degradation of pesticides in contaminated soil and water are proving to be effective, sustainable, and cost-efficient alternatives to traditional methods. Advances in microbial degradation including the use of genetically engineered microorganisms and microbial consortia have significantly enhanced the efficiency of pesticide removal. Phytoremediation offers a promising, eco-friendly approach for addressing pesticide contamination, especially when combined with microbial activity. Furthermore, enzyme-based bioremediation and the use of bioreactor systems provide scalable solutions for large-scale pesticide degradation. Despite these promising developments, several challenges remain. The scalability of these techniques, especially for complex, mixed-pesticide environments, is still a major hurdle. Furthermore, environmental factors, such as temperature, pH, and pollutant concentrations, can influence the success of bioremediation efforts. Regulatory and safety concerns regarding the release of genetically engineered microorganisms and their potential impact on ecosystems need to be addressed to ensure the safe deployment of bioremediation technologies.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Goldberg M, Burnett R, Bailar J, Brook J, Bonvalot Y, et al. (2001) . Environ Res 86: 12–25.

,

2. Brook RD, Franklin B, Cascio W, Hong YL, Howard G, et al. (2004) . Circulation 109: 2655-26715.

, ,

3. Laden F, Schwartz J, Speizer F, Dockery D (2006) . Am J Respir Crit Care Med 173: 667-672.

, ,

4. Kunzli N, Jerrett M, Mack W, Beckerman B, Labree L, et al. (2005) Environ. Health Perspect 113: 201-206.

, ,

5. He C, Morawska L, Hitchins J, Gilbert D (2004) Contribution from indoor sources to particle number and massconcentrations in residential houses. Atmos Environ 38: 3405-3415.

, ,

6. Dobbin NA, Sun L, Wallace L, Kulka R, You H, et al. (2018) . Build Environ 135: 286-296.

,

7. Kang K, Kim H, Kim DD, Lee YG, Kim T, et al. (2019) . Sci Total Environ 668: 56-66.

, ,

8. Sun L, Wallace LA, Dobbin NA, You H, Kulka R, et al. (2018) . Aerosol Sci Tech 52: 1370-1381.

,

9. Rim D, Wallace LA, Nabinger S, Persily A (2012) . Sci Total Environ. 432: 350-356.

,

10. Singer BC, Pass RZ, Delp WW, Lorenzetti DM, Maddalena RL, et al. (2017) . Build Environ. 43: 3235–3242.

, ,