黑料网

Economic Inequality; Psychological Mechanisms; Socioeconomic Disparities; Evidence-Based Interventions; Multidisciplinary Approaches; Economic Equity

Introduction

Poverty and economic inequality are pervasive social issues that impact millions of lives worldwide, shaping access to resources, opportunities, and overall well-being. While economic and sociological perspectives have traditionally dominated discussions around these issues, psychology offers unique insights into the individual and collective experiences of poverty [1]. Psychological research has revealed that poverty is not only a matter of material deprivation but also profoundly affects cognition, behavior, and mental health. These findings suggest that understanding and addressing poverty requires a holistic approach that includes psychological factors alongside economic and policy considerations [2]. The purpose of this special section is to bring together cutting-edge psychological research that examines the multifaceted relationship between poverty, economic inequality, and human behavior. The articles in this section explore how psychological mechanisms such as decision-making under scarcity, perceptions of inequality, and the stress associated with economic hardship contribute to the persistence of poverty [3]. Additionally, they highlight interventions that leverage psychological principles to mitigate the negative impacts of poverty and promote greater economic equity.

This introduction provides an overview of the key contributions in this special section, emphasizing the critical role of psychology in addressing poverty and inequality. By integrating psychological research with insights from other disciplines, this section aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of economic disparities and to inform more effective strategies for alleviating poverty [4]. The papers presented here underscore the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach in tackling these complex issues, with psychology playing a central role in both understanding and addressing the challenges posed by poverty and economic inequality.

Results and Discussion

The studies presented in this special section provide compelling evidence of the intricate relationship between psychological processes and economic inequality [5]. Key findings include cognitive and Behavioral Impact of Poverty several studies demonstrate how poverty affects cognitive functions such as decision-making, problem-solving, and risk assessment. Individuals experiencing economic scarcity often engage in short-term thinking, which can perpetuate cycles of poverty. Perceptions of Inequality research show that perceptions of economic inequality influence psychological well-being and social behaviors [6]. Higher perceived inequality is linked to increased feelings of frustration, helplessness, and social distrust, which can further entrench socioeconomic divides. Psychological Stress and Economic Hardship the chronic stress associated with poverty has significant mental health implications, contributing to anxiety, depression, and other psychological disorders [7]. These mental health challenges can, in turn, impair an individual's ability to escape poverty, creating a vicious cycle. Interventions to Mitigate Poverty’s Affects the section highlights several evidence-based interventions designed to alleviate the psychological burden of poverty [8]. These include programs that enhance financial decision-making, promote resilience, and improve access to mental health resources. The effectiveness of these interventions underscores the potential for psychological approaches to contribute meaningfully to poverty alleviation efforts.

Discussion

The findings from this special section underscore the critical role of psychological factors in understanding and addressing poverty and economic inequality. Traditional approaches to these issues have often focused on macroeconomic policies and structural reforms, but the inclusion of psychological insights reveals the importance of addressing the cognitive and emotional dimensions of poverty [9]. The research highlights that poverty is not merely a lack of financial resources but also a condition that deeply influences mental processes and behaviors. For example, the cognitive load imposed by financial scarcity can impair decision-making, leading to choices that perpetuate poverty. Similarly, the stress associated with economic hardship can have long-term effects on mental health, further complicating efforts to improve economic conditions. Moreover, the studies illustrate that people's perceptions of inequality significantly impact their psychological well-being and social interactions [10]. This suggests that efforts to reduce economic inequality must also address the subjective experiences and perceptions of those living in poverty, which are shaped by psychological as well as economic factors. The discussion also emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in developing effective strategies to combat poverty and inequality. By integrating psychological research with economic, social, and policy approaches, more comprehensive and sustainable solutions can be developed. This multidisciplinary approach is essential for addressing the complex, interrelated factors that contribute to poverty and economic disparity.

Conclusion

This special section highlights the significant contributions that psychology can make to the understanding and alleviation of poverty and economic inequality. The research presented demonstrates that psychological factors such as cognition, perception, and stress are central to the experience of poverty and can either perpetuate or alleviate economic hardship. The evidence-based interventions discussed in this section show promise in mitigating the negative effects of poverty, improving mental health, and promoting economic equity. The conclusion of this section calls for a more integrated approach to addressing poverty and inequality, one that combines psychological insights with broader economic and social strategies. Psychology, with its focus on individual and group behavior, offers valuable tools for understanding the human aspects of economic disparity and for designing interventions that can make a real difference in people’s lives.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Stachowiak MK, Kucinski A, Curl R, Syposs C, Yang Y, et al. (2013). Schizophr Res 143: 367-376.

, ,

2. Paul L, Benjamin HY, Camilla B, Yudi P, Tyrone DC, et al. (2009). Lancet 373: 234-239.

, ,

3. Jakub T, Hassan R, Paul CG, Sabine B (2016). Schizophr Res 176: 3-13.

, ,

4. Bjorn RR (2018). Scand J Psychol 59: 49-58.

, ,

5. Rachel U, Steven M, Max B (2017). Schizophr Bull 43: 240-244.

, ,

6. Christopher AR, Russell LM, Sarah AJR, Mikhail P, Joseph TC, et al. (2006). Neuron 52: 139-153.

, ,

7. Pagel T, Baldessarini RJ, Franklin J, Baethge C (2013). Acta Psychiatr Scand 128: 238-250.

, ,

8. Anaamika C, Robert HM, Toer S, Leigh AR, Michael M, et al. (2022). Mol Psychiatry 27: 1217-1225.

, ,

9. Yujuan C, Abby JF, Josh DL (2007). Clin Psychol Rev 27: 266-286.

, ,

10. Bettina S (2018). Praxis (Bern 1994) 107: 623-628.

, , Crossref