黑料网

Coal cleaning; Arsenic; Particulate matter; Environmental pollution; Electrostatic precipitators

Introduction

Coal combustion has been a major source of energy generation worldwide for decades. However, the burning of coal releases a significant amount of heavy metals into the environment, leading to severe ecological and health consequences. Heavy metals such as mercury, lead, cadmium, and arsenic are particularly concerning due to their toxicity and persistence in the environment. To mitigate these risks, extensive research has been conducted to understand the formation of heavy metals during coal burning and develop effective chemical control strategies. This article explores the key findings of such research and highlights the progress made in controlling heavy metal emissions from coal-fired power plants.

Formation of heavy metals from coal combustion

Coal contains trace amounts of heavy metals that are concentrated during the combustion process. The primary sources of heavy metal emissions include both the volatilization of naturally occurring metals in coal and the introduction of additional metals from various sources, such as impurities in the coal, fuel additives, or combustion equipment [1].

Mercury (Hg), a highly toxic heavy metal, is of particular concern. It exists in coal primarily in its elemental form, but during combustion, it undergoes physical and chemical transformations, leading to the emission of mercury Vapor. Other heavy metals, such as lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and arsenic (As), also undergo similar processes, resulting in their release as gases, particles, or attached to particulate matter.

Research findings on heavy metal emissions

Extensive research has been conducted to understand the mechanisms of heavy metal formation and emission during coal combustion.

Influence of coal properties: The concentration and speciation of heavy metals in coal play a significant role in their emissions. Highrank coals tend to have lower concentrations of heavy metals compared to low-rank coals. Additionally, coal properties, such as ash content, sulfur content, and mineralogy, influence the formation and behavior of heavy metals during combustion [2].

Combustion conditions: The operating conditions of coal-fired power plants, including temperature, oxygen availability, residence time, and combustion efficiency, affect heavy metal emissions. Suboptimal conditions can lead to increased emissions of certain heavy metals.

Formation mechanisms: Various mechanisms contribute to the formation of heavy metals, including vaporization, condensation, nucleation, and adsorption. Understanding these mechanisms helps identify opportunities for controlling heavy metal emissions.

Chemical control strategies

To mitigate heavy metal emissions from coal combustion, researchers have developed several chemical control strategies.

Flue gas treatment: Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems, commonly used to remove sulfur dioxide (SO2), can also capture a significant portion of heavy metals. FGD technologies, such as wet scrubbers and dry sorbent injection, can effectively remove mercury, lead, and other heavy metals from flue gases.

Particulate matter control: Electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) and fabric filters are commonly employed to capture particulate matter, including heavy metal-containing particles. Advanced filter media and catalytic additives have been developed to enhance the removal efficiency of heavy metals.

Coal cleaning: Pre-combustion coal cleaning techniques, such as coal washing and beneficiation, can reduce the concentration of heavy metals in coal. This approach minimizes the input of heavy metals into the combustion process.

Advanced combustion technologies: Innovative combustion technologies, including fluidized bed combustion, co-firing with biomass, and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), have shown promise in reducing heavy metal emissions [3]. These technologies provide better control over combustion conditions and facilitate the capture of heavy metals.

Method

Sampling and analysis: Researchers collect samples of coal, flue gases, particulate matter, and other relevant materials from coal-fired power plants. These samples are analyzed using various techniques to determine the concentrations and speciation of heavy metals. Analytical methods can include atomic absorption spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and other elemental analysis techniques.

Laboratory-scale combustion experiments: Controlled laboratory-scale experiments are conducted to simulate coal combustion under controlled conditions. These experiments help understand the formation mechanisms of heavy metals during coal burning and evaluate the effects of different parameters such as temperature, oxygen levels, and coal properties [4]. The collected data from these experiments can provide insights into the behavior of heavy metals and their emissions.

Pilot-scale and full-scale studies: Researchers conduct studies at pilot-scale or full-scale coal-fired power plants to assess heavy metal emissions under real-world operating conditions. These studies involve the collection of flue gas samples and analysis of heavy metal concentrations. Continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) and other online measurement techniques are often employed to obtain real-time data on heavy metal emissions.

Chemical control technology evaluation: Researchers assess the effectiveness of various chemical control technologies for mitigating heavy metal emissions. This involves the installation and operation of flue gas treatment systems, such as wet scrubbers, dry sorbent injection, electrostatic precipitators, or fabric filters. The efficiency of these technologies in capturing heavy metals is evaluated through monitoring and analysis of flue gas emissions before and after treatment [5].

Computational modeling: Computational models are developed to simulate coal combustion and predict heavy metal emissions. These models take into account coal properties, combustion conditions, and chemical reactions. Computational modeling helps researchers understand the complex mechanisms involved in heavy metal formation and emission and optimize control strategies.

Field studies and monitoring: Long-term field studies and monitoring programs are conducted at coal-fired power plants to assess the effectiveness of implemented control measures. This involves continuous monitoring of heavy metal emissions, as well as the evaluation of environmental impacts, such as the deposition of heavy metals in soil, water bodies, and vegetation.

Result

Heavy metal emissions: Research has confirmed that coal burning is a significant source of heavy metal emissions, including mercury, lead, cadmium, and arsenic [6]. The concentrations and speciation of these heavy metals vary depending on coal properties, combustion conditions, and combustion technologies.

Formation mechanisms: Studies have revealed the mechanisms involved in the formation of heavy metals during coal combustion. These mechanisms include volatilization, condensation, nucleation, and adsorption. Understanding these processes has helped identify key opportunities for controlling heavy metal emissions.

Influence of coal properties: Research has shown that coal properties, such as rank, ash content, sulfur content, and mineralogy, play a crucial role in heavy metal emissions. High-rank coals generally have lower concentrations of heavy metals compared to low-rank coals. Additionally, certain coal impurities can contribute significantly to heavy metal emissions.

Combustion conditions: The research findings have highlighted the impact of combustion conditions on heavy metal emissions. Factors such as temperature, oxygen availability, residence time, and combustion efficiency influence the formation and behavior of heavy metals during coal burning [7].

Chemical control strategies: Studies have evaluated various chemical control strategies to mitigate heavy metal emissions. Flue gas treatment technologies, such as flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems, have been proven effective in capturing heavy metals, including mercury, lead, and other pollutants. Particulate matter control devices, such as electrostatic precipitators and fabric filters, have also demonstrated successful removal of heavy metal-containing particles.

Coal cleaning and advanced combustion technologies: Pre-combustion coal cleaning techniques, such as coal washing and beneficiation, have shown promise in reducing heavy metal concentrations in coal, thereby reducing their emissions during combustion. Furthermore, advanced combustion technologies, including fluidized bed combustion, co-firing with biomass, and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), has demonstrated improved control over heavy metal emissions [8].

Monitoring and compliance: Research has emphasized the importance of continuous monitoring of heavy metal emissions and compliance with regulatory standards. Long-term monitoring programs have been implemented to assess the effectiveness of control measures and ensure compliance with environmental regulations.

Discussion

Environmental impact: The findings underscore the severe environmental impact of heavy metal emissions from coal combustion. These emissions can contaminate soil, water bodies, and vegetation, leading to long-term ecological damage. Heavy metals are persistent pollutants that can accumulate in the food chain, posing risks to both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Health implications: Heavy metals are known to have detrimental effects on human health. When released into the atmosphere, they can be inhaled or ingested, potentially leading to various health issues, including respiratory problems, cardiovascular diseases, neurological disorders, and even cancer. Understanding the sources and controlling the emissions of heavy metals from coal burning is crucial for safeguarding public health.

Control strategies effectiveness: The research has evaluated the effectiveness of different chemical control strategies in reducing heavy metal emissions. Flue gas treatment technologies, such as wet scrubbers and dry sorbent injection, have proven successful in capturing significant amounts of heavy metals. Similarly, particulate matter control devices [9], including electrostatic precipitators and fabric filters, have shown efficiency in removing heavy metal-containing particles.

Synergistic effects: The research also highlights the interplay between heavy metals and other pollutants emitted from coal combustion. For example, sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions can enhance the formation of certain heavy metals, such as mercury. Therefore, comprehensive control strategies must consider the synergistic effects and address multiple pollutants simultaneously.

Coal quality and source: The quality and source of coal significantly influence heavy metal emissions. Research has demonstrated that highrank coals generally contain lower concentrations of heavy metals compared to low-rank coals. Moreover, impurities present in coal, such as pyrite or other minerals, can contribute to increased heavy metal emissions. This emphasizes the importance of coal quality control and the need to source cleaner coals with lower heavy metal content.

Technological advancements: Advanced combustion technologies, such as fluidized bed combustion, co-firing with biomass, and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), have shown promise in reducing heavy metal emissions. These technologies provide better control over combustion conditions, resulting in lower emissions of heavy metals [10]. Continued research and development in these areas can contribute to cleaner and more efficient energy generation

. Policy and regulation: The findings from research on heavy metals from coal burning inform policy and regulation development. Governments and regulatory bodies can use this research to establish and enforce stricter emission standards, promote the adoption of cleaner technologies, and incentivize coal-fired power plants to implement effective control measures.

Conclusion

Chemical control strategies, including flue gas treatment technologies and particulate matter control devices, have shown promise in reducing heavy metal emissions. These technologies effectively capture heavy metals, contributing to improved air quality and reduced environmental pollution. Additionally, pre-combustion coal cleaning techniques and advanced combustion technologies offer potential solutions to minimize heavy metal content in coal and optimize combustion conditions.

The research outcomes serve as a basis for formulating policies and regulations aimed at reducing heavy metal emissions and promoting cleaner energy generation. Governments and regulatory bodies can use these findings to establish and enforce stricter emission standards, encourage the adoption of cleaner technologies, and support the development of innovative approaches to control heavy metal emissions.

Continued research efforts in this field are essential to further enhance our understanding of heavy metal emissions, explore advanced control technologies, and monitor the long-term effectiveness of implemented strategies. By combining scientific knowledge, technological advancements, and policy actions, we can mitigate the environmental and health impacts associated with heavy metals produced from coal burning, promoting a more sustainable and healthier future.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of interest

None

1. Jeffrey PD, Russo AA, Polyak K, Gibbs E, Hurwitz J, et al. (1995) . Nature 376: 313-320.

, Crossref,

2. Pagano M (2004) . Mol Cell 14: 414-416.

, Crossref,

3. Odle RI, Walker SA, Oxley D, Kidger AM, Balmanno K, et al. (2020) . Mol Cell 77: 228-240 e227.

, Crossref,

4. Tong Y, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Zeng X, Yan M, et al. (2021) . Cell Death Dis 12: 529.

, Crossref,

5. Li L, Wang J, Hou J, Wu Z, Zhuang Y, et al. (2012) . FEBS Lett 586: 4100-4107.

, Crossref,

6. Marlier Q, Jibassia F, Verteneuil S, Linden J, Kaldis P, et al. (2018) . Cell Death Discov 4: 43.

, Crossref,

7. Gregg T, Sdao SM, Dhillon RS, Rensvold JW, Lewandowski SL, et al. (2019) . J Biol Chem 294: 4656-4666.

, Crossref,

8. Feng R, Wen J (2015) . Biol Chem 396: 883-891.

, Crossref,

9. Juuri E, Jussila M, Seidel K, Holmes S, Wu P, et al. (2013) . Development 140: 1424-1432.

, Crossref,

10. Johnston AP, Naska S, Jones K, Jinno H, Kaplan DR, et al. (2013) . Stem Cell Reports 1: 38-45.

, Crossref,