黑料网

Typhoid fever; Bacteremia; Gastroenteritis; Illness; Infection

Introduction

Worldwide, approximately 2.8 billion cases of diarrheal disease are attributed to salmonella infections, which are a major cause of acute gastroenteritis. The majority of intestinal Salmonella infections are self limiting, so the data collected by public health authorities typically only represent a small percentage of the total cases. The Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group was established by the World Health Organization with the intention of obtaining data that is more representative and accurate for these diseases. However, the lack of sufficient health system infrastructure in many nations to support the development of programs for the surveillance of food borne illnesses makes it difficult to estimate the global burden of Salmonella infections. Typhoid fever's epidemiology is very different from that of NTS infections. While the majority of typhoid Salmonella infections in the United States are acquired abroad, NTS infections are widespread worldwide [1].

Epidemiology

Between 1998 and 2008, Salmonella species were the most frequently identified because in outbreaks of food borne illness that were reported to the CDC with a confirmed or suspected cause. Poultry and eggs were most frequently linked to NTS outbreaks. Eggs that haven't been cooked thoroughly or are still raw can also be contaminated. There are two possible sources of contamination for the eggs: organic entities on the shell surface enter the egg, or there might be a direct trans ovarian vaccination of the organic entity into the egg yolk. However, the extensive use of antimicrobials in the poultry industry and more stringent preventative measures has reduced the number of egg related Salmonella outbreaks over time. In the Assembled States, the ongoing assessed recurrence of egg pollution with Salmonella is 1 of every 20,000 eggs. In Extraordinary England, it is legally necessary that all hens be vaccinated against Salmonella. Since this safeguard was implemented in the late 1990s, the number of Salmonella cases in Britain has decreased from 14,771 in 1997 to just 581 in 2009 [2].

The FDA issued nonbinding recommendations to the egg industry in the United States regarding egg production, storage, and transportation. Salmonella vaccinations are regarded as a very efficient component of any program to prevent Salmonella, and a number of preventive measures are suggested. However, a vaccination program's efficacy depends on a number of factors, including the vaccination program used, the effectiveness of the vaccination crew, the age of the birds when the vaccine is given, and the amount of Salmonella in the surrounding environment. Additionally, live poultry has been identified as an NTS infection source. Between 2004 and 2011, 316 cases brought about by Salmonella Montevideo were accounted for from numerous states generally in youngsters more youthful than 5 years old who reported having bought the live youthful poultry as pets. Four clusters of human Salmonella infections were discovered by the national molecular subtyping network for food borne bacteria, Pulse Net, at the beginning of 2013. A single mail order hatchery of ducklings and chicks in Ohio was the source of contact with live poultry for many of these sick people. A sum of 158 individuals from 30 states, 42% of whom were 10 years old or more youthful, were accounted for to have been tainted with these Salmonella serotypes: Newport, Infantis, Lille, and Mbandaka. In May of 2014, a new Salmonella outbreak in the United States was discovered. After infecting 363 individuals from 43 states and Puerto Rico, the outbreak appeared to have ended at the time of writing (the last reported case occurred on September 27, 2014) [3]. Pathogenesis Invasion associated adhesion An important factor in the pathogen's survival and subsequent invasion of the gastrointestinal tract is its attachment to epithelial cells in the intestinal lumen. Adherence is mediated by multiple genes. Adhesion to the cell surface is facilitated by fimbriae and fimbrial operons. Biofilm formation's function has also been discussed. Salmonella attaches to the colon's M (microfold) cells, which are epithelial cells that are above the Peyer patches. Endocytic M cells move the pathogen from the lumen to the basal region, eliciting an immediate immune response. No phagocytic cells like enterocytes, which have been studied in vivo, may also be involved in Salmonella internalization. In the context of a robust inflammatory response, Salmonella can also invade through dendritic cells that extend between epithelial cells or foci of Solitary Intestinal Lymphoid Tissues (SILTs). SILT foci may serve as entry points for Salmonella in the early stages of infection, according to a study conducted on a murine model's small intestine. The Salmonella containing vacuole is a modified phagosome in which the pathogen can survive and reproduce after entering the cell. This helps the microorganisms spread to the circulation and the reticulo endothelial system. The intracellular bacterial development is restricted by inborn macrophage systems. Consequently, people with hindered phagocytic activity, like those with ongoing granulomatous illness, are in danger for developing more extreme, obtrusive NTS diseases [4].

Virulence

The pathogen's attachment to epithelial cells in the intestinal lumen is an important factor in its survival and subsequent invasion of the gastrointestinal tract. Numerous genes regulate adhesion. Fimbriae and fimbrial operons facilitate adhesion to the cell surface. The function of biofilm formation has also been discussed. Salmonella adheres to the epithelial cells above the Peyer patches in the colon known as M (micro fold) cells. An immediate immune response is elicited as the pathogen is moved from the lumen to the basal region by endocytic M cells. Enterocytes, a type of non-phagocytic cell that has been studied in vivo, may also play a role in Salmonella internalization [5].

With regards to a powerful provocative reaction, Salmonella can likewise attack through dendritic cells that stretch out between epithelial cells or foci of singular digestive lymphoid tissues. According to a study that was carried out on the small intestine of a murine model, SILT foci may act as entry points for Salmonella in the early stages of infection. The Salmonella containing vacuole is a changed phagosome in which the microbe can make due and recreate subsequent to entering the phone. The microorganisms are helped to spread to the reticulo endothelial system and circulation as a result of this. Inborn macrophage systems restrict bacterial intracellular development. As a result, individuals with impaired phagocytic activity, such as those with ongoing granulomatous disease, run the risk of developing more severe, noticeable NTS diseases.

Other pro inflammatory cytokines like granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor, monocyte chemotactic protein 1, and tumor necrosis factor-a are also induced by Salmonella. Salmonella's lipid A may have correlations with virulence or immune response activation, but the specifics of these relationships are still unclear. A few qualities connected with destructiveness are likewise liable for the seriousness of the infection. For instance, most Salmonella convey an iro quality group (iroN, iroBCDE) [6].

By encoding a lipocalin resistant siderophore that provides iron to the inflamed gut, these gene clusters can provide resistance to the peptide lipocalin 2. Additionally, the names SPI-1 and -2 have been given to two Salmonella Pathogenicity Islands (SPIs). Multiple virulence factors are encoded by these SPIs, which are compounds made up of 40 kilobases of DNA. One of these, known as type III secretions systems, injects proteins into the cells that are being targeted, facilitating the bacteria's entry into those cells. The genes that initiate intestinal secretory and inflammatory responses are encoded by SPI-1. SPI-2 is only activated once Salmonella enters the cell, and the products it encodes are necessary for macrophage survival and replication [7].

Diagnosis

DNA tests and polymerase-chain-response examines are more current techniques for the analysis of typhoid fever and are accessible in research labs. Access to molecular tests is typically not available due to cost in developing nations where typhoid fever is prevalent. Clinical criteria-based algorithms have been developed, but they have not yet been validated.

Instrument societies have a low responsiveness for the finding of typhoid fever (30%) also; depend on the volume of dung refined. Due to the irregular shedding of the bacteria, multiple stool samples should be obtained in order to identify asymptomatic and chronic carriers. Utilization of the agglutination response to Vi-capsular antigen has been portrayed as an evaluating instrument for persistent transporters of Salmonella Typhi. This test has a responsiveness of 70% to 80% and an explicitness of 80% to 95% when utilized for this reason. Be that as it may, the test would have limitations in settings where Vi-based typhoid antibody use is boundless [8].

Prevention

Patients with salmonellosis should not prepare food, and before restaurant workers with Salmonella infection can return to work, many health departments in the United States require strep testing to identify their carrier bacteria. As mentioned in previous sections, ducklings, mail order chicks from hatcheries, and reptile pets like turtles, iguanas, lizards, and snakes have all contributed significantly to significant outbreaks of Salmonella in the United States. The CDC advises against keeping these pets because of this. In 1975, small turtles were banned from being sold because they were found to be a common source of salmonella. However, they continue to be sold, and pet turtle related incidents continue to be reported. Schools with pets in the classroom should avoid small turtles and other reptiles and encourage students to wash their hands whenever they come into contact with them. After handling pets, children should be washed by their parents [9, 10].

Children who present with an NTS infection at childcare facilities must be excluded until diarrhea subsides. Following an NTS infection, negative stool cultures are not required to return to childcare. Workers in childcare facilities are subject to similar recommendations.

Conclusion

In endemic areas and for outbreak control, the WHO recommends the ViCPS and Ty21a vaccines. The proposal for routine immunization of young kids against Salmonella Typhi was delivered in a WHO explanation in 2003. In areas where MDR strains of Salmonella Typhi are prevalent and where typhoid fever is a public health issue, the statement recommends immunization of young children. The WHO likewise firmly suggests immunization against typhoid fever during an episode as a successful device for counteraction. Likewise, vaccicountry ought to be considered for the people who previously experienced the illness if re openness is probably going to happen, in light of the fact that normal disease doesn't give lifelong invulnerability against Salmonella Typhi. If a child or a member of staff is found to have a symptomatic Salmonella Typhi infection in a childcare facility, it is recommended to take stool samples from all attendees and staff members and exclude those who are infected. The length of the exclusion period is determined by the infected person's age. Most of the time, children younger than 5 years old need to have three negative stool samples before they can go back to the site. People older than 5 years old need to go 24 hours without having diarrheal stools before they can go back. Regulations for testing and the duration of exclusion should be discussed with state and local health departments because they may differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

1. Lynch MF, Blanton EM, Bulens S (2009) . JAMA 302: 859-65.

, ,

2. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ (2011) . Emerg Infect Dis 17: 7-15.

, ,

3. Framer J (1995) . Manual of clin microb Washington, DC: ASM Press 438.

Google Scholar

4. Brenner FW, Villar RG, Angulo FJ (2000) . J Clin Microbiol 38: 2465-2467.

, ,

5. Hopkins RS, Jajosky RA, Hall PA (2005) . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 52: 1-85.

,

6. Voetsch AC, Van Gilder TJ, Angulo FJ (2004) . Clin Infect Dis 38: S127-S134.

, ,

7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011). . MMWR 60: 749-55.

,

8. Hennessy TW, Hedberg CW, Slutsker L (1996) . The Investigation Team. N Engl J Med 334: 1281-1286.

, ,

9. Wells EV, Boulton M, Hall W (2004) . Clin Infect Dis 39: 687-691.

, ,