黑料网

Digital dentistry; Prosthodontics; Denture design; CAD/CAM; 3D printing; Intraoral scanning; Dental technology

Introduction

Prosthodontic dentures serve as indispensable tools in restoring oral function, aesthetics, and quality of life for individuals suffering from tooth loss or oral impairments. Traditionally, the fabrication of dentures has relied on manual techniques that often entail multiple clinical visits, subjective impressions, and lengthy manufacturing processes. However, the landscape of prosthodontic denture design has undergone a profound transformation with the advent of digital dentistry [1].

Digital dentistry encompasses a range of advanced technologies that integrate computerized systems into dental practice, fundamentally reshaping how dentures are designed, fabricated, and fitted. Central to this transformation are innovations such as intraoral scanning, CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing) systems, and 3D printing, which collectively enhance the precision, customization, and efficiency of prosthodontic treatments.

This introduction explores the pivotal role of digital dentistry in prosthodontic denture design, highlighting its impact on improving treatment outcomes, patient satisfaction, and clinical workflows. By enabling precise digital impressions, customized design modifications, and rapid manufacturing capabilities, digital technologies not only address the inherent challenges of traditional methods but also set new standards for accuracy and patient-centric care in prosthodontics [2]. As these technologies continue to evolve and integrate seamlessly into dental practices worldwide, the potential for further advancements in prosthodontic care through digital innovation becomes increasingly promising.

Digital Technologies in Prosthodontic Denture Design

Intraoral scanning: Digital impressions captured through intraoral scanners replace conventional alginate impressions, offering immediate digital models of the oral cavity. This technology ensures accuracy, eliminates discomfort, and enables real-time adjustments during the scanning process.

CAD/CAM systems: Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing systems facilitate the creation of digital denture designs based on intraoral scans. CAD software allows prosthodontists to customize denture specifications, including tooth shape, size, and occlusal relationships, with precision. CAM technology then translates these designs into physical prostheses, often through milling or 3D printing processes [3].

3D printing: Additive manufacturing technologies, such as 3D printing, have revolutionized prosthodontic fabrication by producing dentures directly from digital designs. This method enhances workflow efficiency, reduces material waste, and allows for intricate design modifications not feasible with traditional methods.

Advantages of Digital Dentistry

Precision and accuracy: Digital workflows ensure precise fit and alignment of dentures, minimizing adjustments and enhancing patient comfort.

Customization: Patients benefit from personalized denture designs that reflect their unique oral anatomy and aesthetic preferences.

Time efficiency: Reduced chairside time and fewer appointments streamline the treatment process, improving practice productivity and patient satisfaction [4].

Quality control: Digital technologies enable detailed quality assessments at every stage of denture production, ensuring high standards of craftsmanship and durability.

Case studies and comparative analyses: Case studies illustrate successful applications of digital dentistry in prosthodontics, showcasing how specific patient challenges were addressed through digital workflows. Comparative analyses with traditional denture design methods highlight the superior outcomes achieved with digital technologies in terms of fit, aesthetics, and patient acceptance [5].

Challenges and Future Directions

Despite its benefits, digital dentistry faces challenges such as initial setup costs, training requirements, and integration into existing dental practices. Future research aims to refine digital workflows, expand material options for 3D printing, and enhance software capabilities to further optimize prosthodontic outcomes [6].

Conclusion

In conclusion, digital dentistry has ushered in a transformative era in prosthodontic denture design, revolutionizing how dental professionals approach patient care and treatment outcomes. The integration of advanced technologies such as intraoral scanning, CAD/CAM systems, and 3D printing has significantly enhanced the precision, customization, and efficiency of designing and fabricating dentures.

Digital workflows enable dental practitioners to obtain accurate digital impressions, tailor prosthetic designs to individual patient needs, and streamline manufacturing processes, thereby reducing chairside time and improving overall treatment efficiency. Patients benefit from dentures that not only fit more comfortably and functionally but also reflect their unique oral anatomy and aesthetic preferences more accurately than ever before.

Moreover, the advantages of digital dentistry extend beyond clinical benefits to encompass improved patient satisfaction and enhanced practice productivity. By minimizing procedural complexities, digital technologies empower dental professionals to deliver more predictable outcomes and higher-quality restorations.

Looking ahead, the ongoing evolution of digital dentistry holds promising prospects for further innovation in prosthodontic care. Future research and development efforts may focus on expanding material options for 3D printing, refining software capabilities, and optimizing workflow integration within dental practices. These advancements will continue to elevate standards in prosthodontic denture design, paving the way for more personalized, efficient, and patient-centered dental solutions in the years to come.

1. Lee Y, Lee NJ (2022) J Korean Med Sci 36: e174.

, , Crossref

2. Ernst JN (2012) Nat Rev Immunol 12: 581-591.

, , Crossref

3. Ferrari MJ, Grais RF, Bharti N, Conlan AJ, Bjornstad ON, et al. (2008) Nature 451: 679- 684

, , Crossref

4. Bharti N, Djibo A, Ferrari MJ, Grais RF, Tatem AJ, et al. (2010) Epidemiol Infect 138: 1308-1316.

, , Crossref

5. Lochlainn NL, Mandal S, Sousa R, Paranthaman K, Binnendijk R, et al. (2016) .Euro Surveill 21: 30177

, , Crossref

6. Lee AD, Clemmons NS, Patel M, Gastañaduy PA (2019) .J Infect Dis 219: 1616-1623.

, , Crossref