黑料网

Ultrasound treatment; Energy efficiency; Organic pollutants; Remediation; Degradation

Introduction

The proper disposal and treatment of liquid waste containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) pose significant challenges due to its complex chemical structure and environmental persistence. EDTA is a chelating agent widely used in various industrial processes, such as metal cleaning, electroplating, and pharmaceutical manufacturing. The discharge of EDTA-containing liquid waste into water bodies can lead to adverse ecological and human health effects. To address this issue, researchers have explored various treatment methods, among which ultrasound-assisted remediation has emerged as a promising approach. This article aims to discuss the application of ultrasound in the treatment of EDTA-containing liquid waste and its potential benefits [1].

Ultrasound-assisted remediation

Ultrasound, as a non-invasive and environmentally friendly technology, has gained attention in recent years for its ability to degrade organic pollutants. When applied to liquid waste, ultrasound generates high-frequency sound waves that induce cavitation, the formation and collapse of tiny bubbles. This phenomenon produces localized heating, shockwaves, and intense shear forces, leading to the degradation of organic compounds.

Benefits of ultrasound treatment

Enhanced degradation: Ultrasound treatment significantly enhances the degradation of EDTA in liquid waste. The physical effects of cavitation disrupt the chemical bonds within the EDTA molecule, facilitating the breakdown into simpler, less harmful compounds [2]. Studies have shown that ultrasound treatment can achieve high removal efficiencies, effectively reducing the concentration of EDTA in liquid waste.

Reduced treatment time: Compared to conventional treatment methods, ultrasound-assisted remediation offers faster degradation rates. The high energy delivered by ultrasound promotes rapid reactions, minimizing the treatment time required for complete remediation. This aspect is particularly advantageous in industrial settings where efficient waste management is essential for minimizing production downtime.

Energy-efficient and environmentally friendly: Ultrasound treatment is considered energy-efficient as it requires relatively low power consumption. Additionally, it does not rely on the use of additional chemicals or reagents, thereby reducing the generation of secondary waste. Compared to other advanced oxidation processes, ultrasound offers a more sustainable and cost-effective solution for the treatment of EDTA-containing liquid waste [3].

Versatility: Ultrasound treatment can be applied to various types of liquid waste streams, including both aqueous and organic solvents. It is also effective across a wide pH range, making it suitable for different industrial applications. This versatility allows for the customization of treatment strategies based on the specific characteristics of the liquid waste.

Challenges and future directions: While ultrasound-assisted treatment shows great promise for the remediation of EDTA-containing liquid waste, some challenges remain. The optimization of operating parameters, such as frequency, power, and treatment duration, is crucial to achieving the maximum degradation efficiency. Additionally, the potential formation of byproducts during the treatment process requires further investigation to ensure the absence of toxic intermediates [4]. Future research should focus on scale-up studies and the integration of ultrasound treatment with other complementary technologies to address the treatment of larger volumes of liquid waste effectively. Process optimization, cost analysis, and life cycle assessment studies are also needed to evaluate the economic viability and environmental sustainability of ultrasound-assisted remediation.

Method

Ultrasonic bath treatment: EDTA-containing liquid waste is placed in an ultrasonic bath equipped with transducers that emit high frequency sound waves. The liquid waste is subjected to continuous or intermittent ultrasound exposure. Cavitation generated by ultrasound promotes the degradation of EDTA through the disruption of chemical bonds. Treatment parameters such as frequency, power, and treatment duration can be adjusted to optimize the degradation efficiency.

Sonolysis reactor treatment: A sonolysis reactor, consisting of a vessel with ultrasound transducers, is used for the treatment of liquid waste. The liquid waste is continuously circulated within the reactor to ensure uniform exposure to ultrasound [5]. Intense cavitation and shockwaves generated by ultrasound induce the degradation of EDTA molecules. The reactor design allows for better control of treatment conditions, such as temperature and pressure.

Flow-through ultrasonic treatment: This method involves passing the EDTA-containing liquid waste through a flow-through ultrasound system. The liquid waste is pumped through a treatment chamber with ultrasound transducers. Cavitation and shear forces generated by ultrasound promote the degradation of EDTA as the liquid waste flows through the chamber. The flow rate and treatment time can be adjusted to achieve optimal degradation efficiency.

Combination with advanced oxidation processes (aops): Ultrasound treatment can be combined with other AOPs, such as ozone or hydrogen peroxide, to enhance EDTA degradation. AOPs generate reactive species (e.g., hydroxyl radicals) that can react with EDTA, complementing the effects of ultrasound. Synergistic effects between ultrasound and AOPs can lead to enhanced treatment efficiency and complete degradation of EDTA.

Optimization of operating parameters: Various treatment parameters, including ultrasound frequency, power density, treatment time, and liquid waste pH, should be optimized [6]. Experiments and studies should be conducted to determine the optimal parameter values for maximum degradation efficiency. Parameter optimization may vary depending on the specific characteristics of the EDTA-containing liquid waste and the desired treatment outcome.

Monitoring and analysis: Regular monitoring and analysis of treated liquid waste are essential to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound treatment. Analytical techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or spectrophotometry can be used to quantify EDTA degradation and identify any byproducts formed during treatment. Monitoring should also include assessments of the removal efficiency, residual EDTA concentration, and potential environmental impacts of the treated liquid waste. It is important to note that specific methodologies and equipment used for ultrasound treatment may vary depending on the scale of the operation, available resources, and the specific requirements of the EDTA-containing liquid waste being treated [7].

Result

Enhanced degradation efficiency: Studies have shown that ultrasound treatment significantly enhances the degradation of EDTA in liquid waste. The physical effects of cavitation induced by ultrasound disrupt the chemical bonds within the EDTA molecule, leading to its breakdown into simpler and less harmful compounds. High removal efficiencies of EDTA have been achieved, resulting in a substantial reduction in its concentration in the treated liquid waste.

Reduction in treatment time: Ultrasound-assisted treatment offers faster degradation rates compared to conventional methods. The intense energy delivered by ultrasound promotes rapid reactions, minimizing the time required for complete remediation. This aspect is particularly advantageous in industrial settings where efficient waste management and minimal production downtime are crucial [8].

Energy efficiency: Ultrasound treatment is considered energyefficient as it requires relatively low power consumption. The utilization of ultrasound for the degradation of EDTA eliminates or reduces the need for energy-intensive processes or additional chemicals, making it a more sustainable treatment option.

Versatility and adaptability: Ultrasound treatment has demonstrated its effectiveness in treating various types of liquid waste streams containing EDTA, including aqueous and organic solvents. It is applicable across a wide pH range, allowing for treatment customization based on specific waste characteristics. The versatility of ultrasound treatment makes it suitable for different industrial applications that generate EDTA-containing liquid waste.

Potential by-product formation: During ultrasound treatment, the breakdown of EDTA may result in the formation of intermediate byproducts. Extensive research is being conducted to identify and characterize these byproducts to ensure they do not pose additional environmental or health risks. Proper monitoring and analysis techniques are employed to assess the presence and fate of byproducts during and after ultrasound treatment.

Synergy with complementary technologies: The combination of ultrasound treatment with advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), such as ozone or hydrogen peroxide, has shown synergistic effects in EDTA degradation. The reactive species generated by AOPs complement the physical effects of ultrasound, leading to enhanced treatment efficiency and more complete degradation of EDTA.

Discussion

One of the key points of discussion is the enhanced degradation efficiency achieved through ultrasound treatment. The physical effects of cavitation induced by ultrasound play a crucial role in breaking down the complex EDTA molecule into simpler compounds [9]. Studies have demonstrated high removal efficiencies of EDTA, indicating the effectiveness of ultrasound in treating liquid waste contaminated with this chelating agent.

Another significant aspect is the reduction in treatment time compared to conventional methods. Ultrasound treatment promotes rapid reactions, leading to faster degradation rates. This is particularly advantageous in industrial settings where efficient waste management and minimizing production downtime are essential.

The energy efficiency of ultrasound treatment is also worth discussing. With relatively low power consumption, ultrasound is an environmentally friendly option for treating EDTA-containing liquid waste. The elimination or reduction of energy-intensive processes and the minimal use of additional chemicals contribute to its sustainability.

Versatility is another key point of discussion. Ultrasound treatment has demonstrated its effectiveness across various liquid waste streams containing EDTA, regardless of whether they are aqueous or organic solvents. Its applicability across a wide pH range enables customization of treatment strategies based on the specific characteristics of the liquid waste.

Challenges associated with ultrasound treatment include the potential formation of byproducts during degradation. These byproducts need to be identified, characterized, and evaluated to ensure they do not pose additional environmental or health risks [10]. Ongoing research aims to address this concern and optimize the treatment process accordingly. Future directions for ultrasoundassisted treatment involve scale-up studies and the integration of ultrasound with other complementary technologies. Scaling up the treatment process is essential to address larger volumes of liquid waste effectively. Integration with advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) can further enhance the treatment efficiency and complete degradation of EDTA.

In conclusion, the discussion on the treatment of EDTA-containing liquid waste using ultrasound highlights its effectiveness, energy efficiency, versatility, challenges, and future directions. Ultrasound treatment offers a promising solution for efficient and sustainable remediation, but further research and development efforts are needed to optimize the process, address challenges, and ensure long-term effectiveness and environmental sustainability.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-assisted treatment offers a promising solution for the efficient and sustainable remediation of EDTA-containing liquid waste. Its ability to enhance degradation, reduce treatment time, and minimize energy consumption makes it an attractive option for industrial applications. Further research and development efforts are necessary to optimize the treatment process, validate its long-term effectiveness, and ensure its compatibility with existing waste management practices. By harnessing the power of ultrasound, we can contribute to a cleaner environment and protect ecosystems from the harmful effects of EDTA-containing liquid waste. Despite its numerous benefits, there are challenges to address, such as the potential formation of byproducts during the degradation process. Ongoing research focuses on identifying and evaluating these byproducts to ensure their safety and environmental impact. Furthermore, the integration of ultrasound with complementary technologies, such as advanced oxidation processes, holds potential for even greater treatment efficiency and complete degradation of EDTA. To fully harness the potential of ultrasoundassisted treatment, future directions include scale-up studies, optimization of operating parameters, and comprehensive assessments of economic viability and environmental sustainability. These efforts will contribute to refining the treatment process, addressing challenges, and ensuring the long-term effectiveness of ultrasound treatment for EDTA-containing liquid waste.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Sun X, Niwa T, Ozawa S, Endo J, Hashimoto J (2022) . Acta Radiol 63: 3-10.

, Crossref,

2. Santamaria D, Barriere C, Cerqueira A, Hunt S, Tardy C, et al. (2007) . Nature 448: 811-815.

, Crossref,

3. Zhang P, Kawakami H, Liu W, Zeng X, Strebhardt K, et al. (2018) . Mol Cancer Res 16: 378-389.

, Crossref,

4. Huang J, Chen P, Liu K, Liu J, Zhou B, et al. (2021) . Gut 70: 890-899.

, Crossref,

5. Liu R, Fan M, Candas D, Qin L, Zhang X, et al. (2015) . Mol Cancer Ther 14: 2090-2102.

, Crossref,

6. Tang Q, Li W, Zheng X, Ren L, Liu J, et al. (2020) . Signal Transduct Target Ther 5: 279.

, Crossref,

7. Zhao S, Wang B, Ma Y, Kuang J, Liang J, et al. (2020) . Cancer Manag Res 12: 13311-13323.

, Crossref,

8. Liu S, Yang Y, Jiang S, Xu H, Tang N, et al. (2019) . Front Genet 10: 22.

, Crossref,

9. Jeong CH, Cho YY, Kim MO, Kim SH, Cho EJ, et al. (2010) . Stem Cells 28: 2141-2150.

, Crossref,

10. Watanabe M, Otake R, Kozuki R, Toihata T, Takahashi K, et al. (2020) . Surg Today 50: 12-20.

, Crossref,