ºÚÁÏÍø

Brain tumors are among the most challenging neoplasms to diagnose and treat. They encompass a wide range of benign and malignant conditions, with gliomas, meningiomas, and metastases being the most common types. Conventional MRI is the primary imaging modality used for the detection and assessment of brain tumors. However, MRI often lacks specificity in differentiating between tumor types, distinguishing tumor from edema, and evaluating the molecular features of tumors. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) addresses these limitations by providing metabolic and biochemical data, thereby enhancing the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of brain tumor imaging. MRS measures the concentration of various metabolites in tissue, including markers such as choline (Cho), N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr), lactate, and others. These metabolites are involved in cell membrane turnover, energy metabolism, and cell viability. MRS enables clinicians to assess the metabolic changes occurring in tumor cells, providing essential information on tumor grade, aggressiveness, and response to treatment. Furthermore, it can be performed in conjunction with conventional MRI, adding a layer of functional data without requiring additional patient interventions [1]. This review will discuss the clinical applications of MR spectroscopy in brain tumor diagnosis, its advantages and limitations, and how future advancements in technology and data analysis may enhance its utility in clinical practice.

Principles and Techniques of MR Spectroscopy

MR spectroscopy operates based on the principles of magnetic resonance, similar to MRI. In MRS, the magnetic field and radiofrequency pulses cause the nuclei of specific elements within tissues, primarily hydrogen, to resonate. Different metabolites in the brain, such as choline, creatine, N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), lactate, and lipids, have distinct chemical shifts, which can be detected and quantified by MRS. These metabolites provide information about the biochemical environment of tissues, helping to differentiate between normal brain tissue and pathological changes caused by tumors. The two most commonly used MRS techniques are single-voxel spectroscopy (SVS) and multi-voxel spectroscopy (MVS). SVS focuses on a single, selected region of interest, providing detailed spectral information about the metabolites in that area. MVS, also known as chemical shift imaging (CSI), allows for the assessment of multiple regions within the brain, providing a broader overview of metabolic changes across different areas of the tumor and surrounding tissue. Both techniques offer valuable insights into the metabolic profile of brain tumors, with MVS providing more comprehensive data across a larger tissue volume [2].

Clinical Applications of MR Spectroscopy in Brain Tumors

One of the primary applications of MRS in brain tumor diagnosis is in distinguishing between different types of brain tumors and differentiating them from other lesions, such as abscesses or metastases. Brain tumors often exhibit characteristic metabolic profiles that can be detected with MRS. For example, gliomas, the most common type of primary brain tumor, typically show increased levels of choline (a marker of membrane turnover) and decreased levels of NAA (a marker of neuronal health). These metabolic changes are indicative of tumor presence and can help in identifying the tumor’s cellular composition and aggressiveness. MRS is particularly useful in assessing the grade of gliomas. High-grade gliomas, such as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), often exhibit a higher choline-to-NAA ratio, reflecting rapid cell proliferation and membrane synthesis, along with increased lactate and lipids, which are byproducts of anaerobic metabolism. In contrast, low-grade gliomas tend to have a more benign metabolic profile, with relatively preserved NAA levels and lower choline concentrations. MRS can thus serve as a non-invasive adjunct to histopathological grading, providing real-time metabolic information that complements biopsy and surgical planning [3]. In addition to gliomas, MRS is useful in the evaluation of other brain tumors, including meningiomas, pituitary tumors, and metastatic lesions. For example, meningiomas often exhibit increased choline levels, but they typically do not show the same degree of metabolic abnormalities seen in gliomas, such as reduced NAA. MRS can help differentiate between primary tumors and metastases, as metastatic lesions may display altered metabolic profiles depending on their tissue origin. The ability to differentiate between different tumor types can aid in planning the most appropriate treatment approach. Another important application of MRS in brain tumor diagnosis is in monitoring tumor response to therapy. After treatment, such as surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy, MRS can provide valuable information about the metabolic changes in the tumor and surrounding tissue. A reduction in tumor metabolism, reflected by a decrease in choline levels and an increase in NAA, may indicate a positive response to therapy. Conversely, an increase in lactate or lipids may suggest tumor recurrence or aggressive progression. This non-invasive method of monitoring treatment response can help clinicians detect early signs of recurrence before structural changes become evident on conventional MRI scans [4].

MR Spectroscopy in Tumor Recurrence Detection

Detecting tumor recurrence is one of the most challenging aspects of brain tumor management. Recurrence can occur even in the absence of obvious structural changes on MRI, especially in low-grade gliomas or tumors located in difficult-to-access areas of the brain. MRS provides a valuable tool for early detection of recurrence by evaluating metabolic changes in regions previously affected by the tumor. In patients with suspected recurrence, an increase in choline levels and a decrease in NAA or creatine can indicate the regrowth of tumor cells, even when no significant structural changes are visible on conventional imaging. Furthermore, MRS can help differentiate between recurrent tumor and radiation necrosis, a common complication of brain tumor treatment. Radiation necrosis often presents with imaging characteristics similar to tumor recurrence, such as mass effect or contrast enhancement on MRI. However, MRS can detect differences in the metabolic profiles of these conditions. Radiation necrosis typically exhibits low choline levels, preserved NAA, and a lack of lactate or lipid peaks, which contrasts with the elevated choline and lactate levels seen in recurrent tumors. This ability to differentiate between recurrence and treatment-related changes can significantly impact clinical decision-making and avoid unnecessary interventions [5].

Limitations and Challenges of MR Spectroscopy

Despite its promising applications, MRS has certain limitations that must be considered in clinical practice. One of the main challenges is the limited spatial resolution of MRS compared to conventional MRI. MRS typically requires larger volumes of tissue to produce reliable spectra, which can make it difficult to target small or diffuse tumors, especially in complex areas of the brain. Furthermore, MRS is sensitive to motion artifacts, which can reduce the quality of the spectral data, particularly in pediatric or uncooperative patients. Another challenge is the interpretation of MRS data. The metabolic profiles of brain tumors can be complex and overlap with those of other conditions, such as inflammation or infections. The spectral peaks from various metabolites can be influenced by a variety of factors, including the type of tumor, its grade, and the surrounding tissue. This variability requires a high level of expertise to interpret the results accurately, and there can be significant interobserver variability. The use of MRS as a standalone diagnostic tool is limited, and it is often used in conjunction with other imaging modalities, such as MRI and PET, for a more comprehensive assessment. Additionally, while MRS provides valuable metabolic information, it does not offer direct insights into the histological features of the tumor, such as the presence of specific mutations or genetic markers. For a more complete understanding of the tumor, molecular imaging techniques, such as PET imaging with radiolabeled probes, may be required to complement the metabolic information provided by MRS [6].

Future Prospects of MR Spectroscopy

The future of MRS in brain tumor diagnosis holds great promise, with ongoing advancements aimed at improving its accuracy, resolution, and clinical utility. One area of development is the enhancement of MRS techniques to increase spatial resolution, allowing for more precise localization of metabolic changes within smaller or more diffuse tumors [7]. Advances in hardware, such as higher magnetic field strengths (e.g., 7 Tesla MRI), may also improve the sensitivity and resolution of MRS, enabling better detection of metabolic abnormalities in tumor tissue. The integration of MRS with other imaging modalities, such as PET and functional MRI, is another area of active research. Combining metabolic information from MRS with the anatomical and functional data from MRI or PET could provide a more comprehensive view of tumor characteristics, such as tumor aggressiveness, response to therapy, and potential for recurrence. For example, combining MRS with PET could allow for the assessment of both metabolic activity and specific molecular targets within the tumor, providing more precise information for personalized treatment strategies. The application of machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) to MRS data analysis is also a promising avenue for future development. AI algorithms could be used to analyze complex MRS spectra more quickly and accurately, identifying subtle patterns in the metabolic profiles of tumors that may be missed by human observers. This could reduce interobserver variability and improve the consistency of MRS-based diagnoses, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes [8].

Conclusion

MR spectroscopy is a valuable tool in the diagnosis, grading, and monitoring of brain tumors. It provides unique biochemical information that complements conventional MRI, aiding in tumor differentiation, grading, and response to therapy. While the technique has some limitations in terms of spatial resolution and technical complexity, ongoing advancements in MRS technology, along with integration with other imaging modalities and AI-based analysis, hold great potential for improving brain tumor management. As the field of neuro-oncology continues to evolve, MR spectroscopy is poised to play a pivotal role in advancing precision medicine and enhancing patient care.

1. Siva C, Brasington R, Totty W, Sotelo A, Atkinson J (2002) . J Rheumatol 29: 1088–1092.

,

2. Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ (2019) . Am J Gastroenterol 114: 529-554.

,

3. Khor B, Gardet A, Xavier RJ (2011) . Nature 474: 307-317.

, Google Scholar,

4. Dogramaci Y, Kalaci A, Sevinç TT, Atik E, Esen E,  et al. (2009) .J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 99: 153–156.

, ,

5. Lichtenstein GR, Loftus EV, Isaacs KL, Regueiro MD, Gerson LB, et al. (2018) . Am J Gastroenterol 113: 481-517.

, ,

6. Ng SC, Shi HY, Hamidi N, Underwood FE, Tang W, et al. (2018) . Lancet 390: 2769-2778.

, ,

7. Torres J, Mehandru S, Colombel JF, Peyrin-Biroulet L (2017) . Lancet 389: 1741-1755.

, ,

8. Baumgart DC, Sandborn WJ (2012) . Lancet 380: 1590-1605.

, ,