黑料网

Diabetes mellitus; chronic metabolic disorder; Global health concern; Chronic ulcers; Osteomyelitis

Introduction

The pathophysiology of bone complications in diabetic feet involves a complex interplay of factors such as neuropathy, microvascular changes, and immune system dysfunction. Osteomyelitis is a common sequel, often necessitating surgical intervention for both infection control and structural reconstruction. Traditional approaches to bone reconstruction, such as autografts and allografts, have shown limited success in diabetic patients due to compromised vascularity and impaired healing capacity. Recent advancements in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering have opened new avenues for addressing bone defects in diabetic foot cases. The use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs), growth factors, and scaffolds has shown promising results in enhancing bone regeneration. Additionally, innovative techniques such as 3D printing and bioactive materials are being explored to provide patient-specific solutions for bone reconstruction in diabetic foot cases [1].

Description

Pathophysiology of bone complications

Explores the intricate mechanisms involved in the development of bone complications in diabetic foot patients. Discusses the impact of neuropathy, microvascular changes, and immune system dysfunction on bone health [2].

Traditional approaches to bone reconstruction

Reviews conventional methods such as autografts and allografts in addressing bone defects. Analyzes the limitations of traditional approaches, particularly in the context of compromised vascularity and impaired healing in diabetic patients [3].

Advances in regenerative medicine

Examines the role of regenerative medicine in bone reconstruction, emphasizing the use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) and growth factors. Discusses the potential of tissue engineering and innovative biomaterials to enhance bone regeneration [4,5].

Technological innovations

Explores emerging technologies like 3D printing and bioactive materials, providing patient-specific solutions for bone reconstruction. Evaluates the feasibility and efficacy of these technologies in the diabetic foot context [7,8].

Multidisciplinary approach

Emphasizes the importance of a collaborative approach involving various healthcare professionals, including endocrinologists, podiatrists, orthopedic surgeons, and wound care specialists [9]. Stresses the need for early detection, comprehensive wound care, and aggressive treatment strategies [10].

Conclusion

By providing a thorough examination of both conventional and contemporary strategies, this comprehensive review aims to contribute to the evolving understanding of diabetic foot complications and guide future research and clinical practices in the reconstruction of bone in diabetic patients.

1. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Hoag RH, Sivilotti ML, Cacciotti TF, et al. (1997) . JAMA. 278: 2075-2079.

,

2. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, McKnight RD, et al. (1995) . Ann Emerg Med. 26: 405-113.

, ,

3. Keyhani S, Kazemi SM, Ahn JH, Verdonk R, Soleymanha M (2019) . J Knee Surg. 32: 427-433.

, ,

4. Kazemi SM, Minaei R, Safdari F, Keipourfard A, Forghani R, et al. (2016) . Arch Bone Jt Surg. 4: 29.

,

5. Stiell IG, Wells GA, McDowell I, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, et al. (1995) . Acad Emerg Med. 2: 966-973.

, ,

6. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, Mc Dowell I, Cwinn AA, et al. (1996) . JAMA. 275: 611-615.

,

7. Seaberg DC, Jackson R (1994) . Am J Emerg Med. 12: 541-543.

, ,

8. Seaberg DC, Yealy DM, Lukens T, Auble T, Mathias S (1998) . Ann Emerg Med. 32: 8-13.

, ,

9. Mohamed A, Babikir E, Mustafa MKE (2020) . Cureus. 12: e8812.

, ,

10. Beutel BG, Trehan SK, Shalvoy RM, Mello MJ (2012) . West J Emerg Med. 13: 366.

, ,

11. Emparanza JI, Aginaga JR (2001) . Ann Emerg Med. 38: 364-368.

, ,

12. Ketelslegers E, Collard X, Vande Berg B, Danse E, ElGariani A, et al. (2002) . Eur Radiol. 12: 1218-1220.

, ,