Our Group organises 3000+ Global Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ 黑料网 Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
Most vision screening protocols worldwide rely on the measurement of visual acuities (VAs) to detect visual anomalies
amongst children of school-going age. This is despite the fundamental design flaws in the Snellen chart. However, there
appears to be a growing demand for the usage of modern technology in the eyecare profession. The aim of this prospective
and quantitative study was to evaluate the equivalence of a standard Snellen chart compared to the Spectrum Eyecare Software
LogMAR chart in evaluating VAs amongst children of school going age. Normative data was collected from three randomly
selected schools in Johannesburg (South Africa) on the non-clinical population of 209 children of school-going age mean
10.13卤2.45 years. Monocular and binocular VAs was measured using the Snellen chart at six meters and the spectrum computer
software program at three meters. The statistical significant differences (p<0.05) were determined using ANOVA for distance
binocular and monocular VAs using the Snellen chart and the Spectrum Eyecare Software. The performance of the Spectrum
Software LogMAR was found to be one line better than that of the Snellen chart. However, the Snellen chart still remains the
simple, easily accessible and inexpensive method to be used for vision screening amongst children of school-going age compared
to the Spectrum Eyecare Software.
Recent Publications:
1. Perera C, Chakrabarti R, Islam F M A and Crowston J (2015) The eye phone studies: reliability and accuracy of assessing
Snellen visual acuity using smartphone technology. Eye (London, England) 29 (7): 888-894.
2. Lodha V S (2015) Comparison of visual acuity measurement by smartphone based application vs. conventional Snellen
visual acuity chart. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Medicines and Dental Care 2(6): 39-41.
3. Gounder P A, Cole E, Colley S, Hille D M (2014) Validation of a portable electronic visual acuity system. Journal of
Manufacturing Technology Management 3 (2): 35-39.
4. Zhang Z T, Zhang S C, Huang X G, et al. (2013) A pilot trial of the iPad tablet computer as a portable device for visual
acuity testing. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 19 (1): 55-59.
5. Trivedi R H, Wilson M E, Peterseim M M, Cole K B and Teed R G W (2010) A pilot study evaluating the use of EyeSpy
video game software to perform vision screening in school-aged children. Journal of AAPOS 14.
Biography
Relevant Topics
Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, 黑料网 Journals