ºÚÁÏÍø

ISSN: 2157-7617

Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change
ºÚÁÏÍø

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ ºÚÁÏÍø Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

ºÚÁÏÍø Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Citations : 5125

Indexed In
  • CAS Source Index (CASSI)
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Online Access to Research in the Environment (OARE)
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • JournalTOCs
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • Access to Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA)
  • Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Proquest Summons
  • SWB online catalog
  • Publons
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Share This Page

The bumpy ride of the EU emission trading scheme: An analysis of regulatory and governance challenges

3rd World Congress on Climate Change and Global Warming

Mei Zi Tan

Monash University, Australia

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Earth Sci Clim Change

DOI:

Abstract
For more than a decade, the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) enjoys the fame for being the world�s largest ETS. Nonetheless, the reality behind this fame is that the scheme has not been optimally designed to achieve its key objective of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. Due to its unsatisfactory performance, many researchers have examined the regulatory challenges in the EU ETS using economic lens. Their works are valuable but less pragmatic for policymakers. This article aims to supplement the existing economic literature on the EU ETS by offering useful insights using legal lens. Specifically, it will analyze the influence of governance factors on the design features of the EU ETS. The regulatory problems of the EU ETS from Phase I to Phase III are explained using a three-level governance model. The main arguments are that the regulatory problems of the earlier phases were due to the discretions given to the member states. On the other hand, the suboptimal reforms in current phase are largely the responsibility of the EU legislative institutions; the European Commission, the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers. As for Phase IV, this article highlights the importance of citizens in shaping the future reforms of the EU ETS. The findings of this article provide relevant inputs for policymakers in the EU and other jurisdictions.
Biography
Relevant Topics
International Conferences 2025-26
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global

Conferences by Country

Medical & Clinical Conferences

Conferences By Subject

Top