黑料网

ISSN: 2161-069X

Journal of Gastrointestinal & Digestive System
黑料网

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ 黑料网 Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

黑料网 Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Citations : 2091

Indexed In
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • SWB online catalog
  • Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Share This Page

Diagnostic performance of Computed Tomographic colonography with limited cathatric preparation in detection of colorectal polyps; Comparison with conventional colonoscopy

4th International Conference on Gastroenterology

Mohammed Farghally Amin and Ayman Hassanin

ScientificTracks Abstracts: J Gastrointest Dig Syst

DOI:

Abstract
Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of Computed Tomographic Colonography with limited bowel preparation for the depiction of colorectal polyps, by using conventional colonoscopy as the goldstandard technique. Material and Methods: Study included forty five consecutively registered patients referred for conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening or for evaluation of colorectal symptoms; they were scheduled to undergoMDCT examination on the same day at Radiology Department in our institution, before the conventional colonoscopy examination. All patients underwent limited preparation. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of CTC versus CCin each group and overall. Results: A total of 60 polypoid lesions were detected with colonoscopy in45 patientsover all sensitivity of CTC in polypdetection was 85.71%, specificity 71.24, PPV 96.77 and NPV 33.33, as regarding CTC performance in each group. Conclusion: This study proved that CTC with limited cathartic bowel preparation and iodinated agents for faecal tagging can obtain high sensitivity and PPV values results for <5 mm polyps comparable to those obtained with conventional preparation with laxatives. Furthermore, this method could really improve the acceptance of CTC for colorectal cancer screening.
Biography
International Conferences 2024-25
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global

Conferences by Country

Medical & Clinical Conferences

Conferences By Subject

Top