ºÚÁÏÍø

ISSN: 2165-7904

Journal of Obesity & Weight Loss Therapy
ºÚÁÏÍø

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ ºÚÁÏÍø Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

ºÚÁÏÍø Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Citations : 2305

Indexed In
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • SWB online catalog
  • CABI full text
  • Cab direct
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • University of Bristol
  • Pubmed
  • ICMJE
Share This Page

Closed or unclosed mesentery? -A meta-analysis of internal herniation (IH) after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB)

25th Global Obesity Meeting

Qian-Long Wu, Quan-Zhen Liu, Ying-Yun Xi, Xiao-Qing Deng, Tong-Shan Xu, Zi-Chun Xie

Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Obes Weight Loss Ther

Abstract
Aims: During laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure, closing mesentery or not was still controversial according to preexisted studies. So, the current meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcome of closure versus non-closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases using the keywords Mesentery, Internal hernia, and Laparoscopy up to August 2, 2022. After searching, the process of selecting the literature that we got and extracting data was performed independently by two reviewers. Besides, we used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess the literature we included. Results: Fifteen studies were included, enrolling 53,488 patients. Based on the outcome of subgroup analysis, the closure of the mesenteric defects showed a low incidence of IH in patients with >41 years (OR 2.62 [95% CI 1.89,3.63]; p <0.00001) and for Mean age�41 years (OR 1.52 [95% CI 1.06,2.18]; p =0.02). Moreover, the closure of the mesenteric defects excels non-closure in terms of Jejunal mesenteric site where IH occurred (OR 3.01 [95% CI 1.91,4.75]; p <0.00001), hospital days (MD 0.49 [95% CI 0.35,0.64]; p <0.00001), reoperation (OR 2.18 [95% CI -2.04,2.33]; p <0.00001), while the non-closure of the mesenteric defects was superior to closure in regard to operative time using absorbable sutures purely (MD -15.00 [95% CI -17.31, -12.69]; p <0.00001). No difference was found between the two groups regarding Petersen�s and Jejunal mesenteric�s IH, small bowel obstruction, anastomosis ulcer, stenosis, leakage, bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation, and postoperative BMI of patients. Conclusions: Regarding Internal Hernia, Jejunal mesenteric site, hospital days, and reoperation, closure of the mesentery was better than non-closure. In terms of operative time, the time of non-closure of the mesentery was shorter than closure. Besides, Petersen�s and Jejunal mesenteric�s IH, small bowel obstruction, anastomosis ulcer, stenosis, leakage, bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation, and postoperative BMI of patients show no difference between non-closure and closure.
Biography
Relevant Topics
International Conferences 2025-26
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global

Conferences by Country

Medical & Clinical Conferences

Conferences By Subject

Top