Our Group organises 3000+ Global Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ ºÚÁÏÍø Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
Aims: During laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure, closing mesentery or not was still controversial according
to preexisted studies. So, the current meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcome of closure versus non-closure of mesenteric
defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases using the
keywords Mesentery, Internal hernia, and Laparoscopy up to August 2, 2022. After searching, the process of selecting the
literature that we got and extracting data was performed independently by two reviewers. Besides, we used the Cochrane
risk of bias tool to assess the literature we included.
Results: Fifteen studies were included, enrolling 53,488 patients. Based on the outcome of subgroup analysis, the closure of
the mesenteric defects showed a low incidence of IH in patients with >41 years (OR 2.62 [95% CI 1.89,3.63]; p <0.00001)
and for Mean age�41 years (OR 1.52 [95% CI 1.06,2.18]; p =0.02). Moreover, the closure of the mesenteric defects excels
non-closure in terms of Jejunal mesenteric site where IH occurred (OR 3.01 [95% CI 1.91,4.75]; p <0.00001), hospital days
(MD 0.49 [95% CI 0.35,0.64]; p <0.00001), reoperation (OR 2.18 [95% CI -2.04,2.33]; p <0.00001), while the non-closure
of the mesenteric defects was superior to closure in regard to operative time using absorbable sutures purely (MD
-15.00 [95% CI -17.31, -12.69]; p <0.00001). No difference was found between the two groups regarding Petersen�s and
Jejunal mesenteric�s IH, small bowel obstruction, anastomosis ulcer, stenosis, leakage, bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation,
and postoperative BMI of patients.
Conclusions: Regarding Internal Hernia, Jejunal mesenteric site, hospital days, and reoperation, closure of the mesentery
was better than non-closure. In terms of operative time, the time of non-closure of the mesentery was shorter than closure.
Besides, Petersen�s and Jejunal mesenteric�s IH, small bowel obstruction, anastomosis ulcer, stenosis, leakage, bleeding, gastrointestinal
perforation, and postoperative BMI of patients show no difference between non-closure and closure.
Biography
Relevant Topics
Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, ºÚÁÏÍø Journals