Our Group organises 3000+ Global Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ ºÚÁÏÍø Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
The study is seeking to explore the dying process as a phenomenon in which relations of power occur in the form of governance
of conduct in palliative care settings in Brasilia/Brazil. The findings revealed a real concern from both practitioners and nonpractitioners
about the quality of death. It became evident that quality of death is a common objective in palliative care practice,
but significant differences were found regarding what quality of death means. Analysis of discourse revealed that normative ideas
of what a good death is and how to obtain it through palliative care conflicted directly with someone who understood a good death
differently. With that said, good death became a contested space between two different cultures.The palliative care practitioners that
participated in this study showed that there are tendencies to achieve the best quality of death possible. It also showed a normative
narrative of a good death based on the Western palliative care movement. The palliative care narrative of a good death has established
a constricted image of what a good death should be transforming it into not only a norm but also in the ultimate objective of palliative
care practitioners. We then concluded that the term ‘good death’ is functioning as a rhetorical device used by practitioners to conduct
the patients and their families to achieve a certain way of death.